In this paper, we examine the effect of labor unions on bank performance during the recent financial crisis. Empirical evidence from the 314 largest global banks indicates that the stock returns and profitability of unionized banks are higher, and the default probabilities are lower than non-unionized banks. Moreover, unionized banks have lower tail risk in their stock returns, more tangible equity, more liquid assets, and better quality lending before the crisis than non-unionized banks. These finding show that unionized banks operate more conservatively and engage in less risk-taking. Our results imply that union preferences can shape the risk culture of banks.

Using a sample of banks from 56 countries, this paper investigates the lending behavior of government banks during the crisis of 2008, and its association with bank performance and the economy. Contrary to the traditional wisdom, we find that government banks can play a beneficial role under certain circumstances. Government banks have higher loan growth rates than private banks during the crisis. In countries with low corruption, the increased lending by government banks is associated with better bank performance and more favorable GDP and employment growth in the crisis period. In contrast, the results for countries with high corruption are more consistent with the political view: the increased lending by government banks is associated with underperformance relative to private banks, and creates no beneficial effects on either GDP growth or employment.