Knowledge that Transforms

To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
42 results ✕ Clear filters

Minutes of the Executive Committee Meeting

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 1986 21(4), 472-473
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Volume 21 Index

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 1986 21(4), 476-478
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Treasurer's Report

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 1986 21(4), 475-475
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

JFQ volume 21 issue 3 Cover and Back matter

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 1986 21(3), b1-b7
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

JFQ volume 21 issue 3 Cover and Front matter

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 1986 21(3), f1-f4
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Minutes of the Annual Meeting

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 1986 21(4), 474-474
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Refunding Discounted Debt: A Clarifying Analysis

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 1986 21(1), 95
This paper demonstrates that refunding discounted debt represents a form of tax arbitrage that is profitable to taxpaying corporations when the present value of the additional tax shields, created through the refunding, exceeds the sum of the present value of the overall increase in pre-tax debt service requirements, after-tax transaction costs, and any tax incurred on the gain. The paper contrasts the factors that give rise to profitable opportunities to refund high-coupon debt and discounted debt. It also shows that, of the analytical approaches previously suggested for calculating the net advantage of refunding discounted debt, discounting the change in after-tax debt service payments at the after-tax cost of money for the refunding issue is the only one consistent with preserving debt service parity.

On the Listing of Corporate Debt: A Note

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 1986 21(1), 107
While the value of listing equity securities has been researched extensively, no studies have examined the market reaction to the decision to list corporate debt. Since the listing of corporate bonds on the major exchanges is a significant corporate activity, this study examines the impact of bond listing on shareholder wealth. Using a variety of possible announcement dates as well as cumulative abnormal returns between dates, no detectable market reaction to debt listing is found. Therefore, the listing of corporate bonds does not appear to be valued by the common shareholders of those same firms.

Stochastic Control of Corporate Investment when Output Affects Future Prices

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 1986 21(3), 239
The advance of the theory of contingent claim pricing has made it possible to model and analyze very complex financial claims. When the value of the firm can be represented as a contingent claim, then the firm's optimal financial policy can be determined with only a slight modification in standard solution techniques for contingent claims. In this paper, stochastic control theory is used to determine a dynamic investment policy for the valuemaximizing firm. The value of future, stochastic economic rents (i.e., the net present value of the firm), and the firm's optimal investment policy must reflect a rational reaction on behalf of its competitors. A computationally efficient methodology is presented for solving the simultaneous investment-valuation problem for an n-firm game.

Market Line Deviations and Market Anomalies with Reference to Small and Large Firms

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 1986 21(2), 161
Previous anomaly research may have misinterpreted corrected, for the market index, mean returns on small firms. Assuming mean-variance preferences, it is shown theoretically that corrected mean returns (i.e., market line deviations) are not indicative of the relative desirability of increasing the proportional investment in small firms. The correct improvement criterion is derived and estimated. Tests indicate that the value-weighted market index is not significantly improved with greater weight on small firms, in the average month. When seasonality is considered, the observed performance improvements due to small or large firms are significant in some months, but the required portfolio position is unclear. If a case exists for a small firm anomaly in January, it probably exists in other months and it also exists for large firms. It is doubtful whether such an anomalous stock market exists.