Female manufacturing workers around 1900 were far more likely to be paid by the piece and were rarely employed at the same occupation in the same firm as males. These and related aspects of work organization can be understood through a model in which workers shirk, monitoring is costly, and males and females have different turnover rates. Employers adopt either piece rates or deferred payment. Occupational segregation by sex and differences in earnings result even if workers are equally productive. Establishment-level data on supervising male and female workers in time- and piece-rate positions are examined.
"In this paper we question the pioneering work of Todaro, which states that rural-to-urban labor migration in less developed countries (LDCs) is an individual response to a higher urban expected income. We demonstrate that rural-to-urban labor migration is perfectly rational even if urban expected income is lower than rural income. We achieve this under a set of fairly stringent conditions: an individual decision-making entity, a one-period planning horizon, and global risk aversion. We obtain the result that a small chance of reaping a high reward is sufficient to trigger rural-to-urban labor migration."
Journal of Labor Economics19864(3, Part 2), S121-S145
"Birth-order effects are posited by many to affect earnings and schooling. We show how such effects can be interpreted to shift either the earnings possibility frontier for siblings or parental preferences. We find empirical evidence for birth-order effects on (age-adjusted) schooling and on earnings for young U.S. adults, though the latter is not robust for all specifications. The examination of intrahousehold allocations suggests that these birth-order differences occur despite parental preferences or prices by birth order favoring later borns, apparently because of stronger endowment effects that favor first borns."
Journal of Labor Economics19864(3, Part 1), 376-414
This paper develops a model of dual labor markets based on employers' need to motivate workers. In order to elicit effort from their workers, employers may find it optimal to pay more than the going wage. This changes fundamentally the character of labor markets. The model is applied to a wide range of labor market phenomena. It provides a coherent framework for understanding the claims of industrial policy advocates. It also can provide the basis for a theory of occupational segregation and discrimination that will not be eroded by market forces. Finally, the model provides the basis for a theory of involuntary unemployment.
Journal of Labor Economics19864(3, Part 2), S1-S39
"This paper develops a model of the transmission of earnings, assets, and consumption from parents to descendants. The model assumes utility-maximizing parents who are concerned about the welfare of their children. The degree of intergenerational mobility is determined by the interaction of this utility-maximizing behavior with investment and consumption opportunities in different generations and with different kinds of luck. We examine a number of empirical studies for different countries. Regression to the mean in earnings in rich countries appears to be rapid. Almost all the earnings advantages or disadvantages of ancestors are wiped out in three generations." A comment by Robert J. Willis is included (pp. 40-7).
This paper describes the equilibrium wage distribution and unemployment rate when firms recruit (search for) employees. A model in which firms' inability to distinguish workers who refuse job offers increases their expected recruiting costs, is contrasted with one in which indistinguishable low-productivity workers decrease firms' expected gains from hiring. In both, work force heterogeneity enhances search uncertainty, firms recruit less intensively than otherwise, and so the equilibrium unemployment rate rises. Heterogeneity reflects searchers' incomplete knowledge of desirable trading partners' locations and will likely be a confounding influence and source of unemployment in large economies with imperfectly observable sector-specific shocks.
The formation of implicit contracts in labor markets with heterogeneous employees is studied. If layoffs occur, the firm finds it optimal to offer differing contracts to differing employees, with employees who place a higher priority on leisure accepting contracts with higher layoff probabilities. The firm can do so without violating the constraint that employees voluntarily sort themselves into these contracts. Under plausible assumptions, the contracts match the empirical observation that relatively low wage rates and high unemployment probabilities tend to be correlated. Finally, an average or composite wage rate varies over states of nature, calling into question the ability of implicit contracts models to account for the constant, representative wage rate often found in macroeconomic models.
This paper examines real wage measures that include leisure and nonlabor income in consumption decisions with respect to the advantages and disadvantages of partial versus complete welfare orderings and of utility-based versus utility-free wage indices. In addition, we argue that the usefulness of a real wage measure beyond welfare comparison has been ignored. To test the robustness of utility-based indices, these real wage measures are calculated for two different utility-function specifications, the indirect addilog system and the linear expenditure system. Further comparisons are made against index bounds that are independent of the functional form for preferences.