To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
3 results ✕ Clear filters

Wage Dispersion and Productive Efficiency: Evidence for Sweden

Journal of Labor Economics 2000 18(4), 755-782
The Swedish record of enormous compression of relative wages under centralized “solidarity” bargaining, followed by substantial decompression of wages after central bargaining broke down, supplies observations well suited to empirical evaluation of arguments about the response of productive efficiency to shifts in wage distribution. We obtain no results supporting “fairness, morale, and cohesiveness” theories implying that wage leveling within workplaces and industries may enhance productivity. Reduction of interindustry wage differentials evidently did, however, contribute positively to aggregate output and productivity growth, most likely for the structural reasons first emphasized by Swedish trade union economists almost a half century ago.

Earnings, Rents, and Competition in the Airline Labor Market

Journal of Labor Economics 2000 18(1), 125-155
This article offers an explanation of the postinjury employment, wage, and accommodation patterns of permanently impaired workers. In particular, it argues that the observed tendency of time‐ofaccident employers to rehire at the preinjury wage, accommodate, and then, perhaps, quickly terminate the impaired worker, is a manifestation of the worker's preferred contract. That contract is characterized by wage inflexibility. By removing the opportunity for the postinjury employer to underreport productivity, this contract creates an incentive for the worker to attempt to functionally adapt to the impairment, thereby increasing expected lifetime utility.

A Reassessment of the New Economics of the Minimum Wage Literature with Monthly Data from the Current Population Survey

Journal of Labor Economics 2000 18(4), 653-680
We estimate the employment effects of federal minimum wage increases using monthly Current Population Survey (CPS) data from 1979 through 1997. We find that the empirical differences in the new minimum wage literature based on CPS data primarily can be traced to alternative methods of controlling for macroeconomic conditions. We argue that the macroeconomic controls commonly included in models where no employment impact is found are inappropriate. We consistently find a significant but modest negative relationship between minimum wage increases and teenage employment using alternative controls or allowing employer responses to the policy to occur with some delay.