A spatial cuing task was used to identify two types of readers, those with a relatively fast and those with a relatively slow buildup of inhibition of return (IOR). Backward-directed eye movements (regressions) during sentence reading were then examined as a function of the two IOR types. The results revealed that readers with fast IOR executed larger regressions than readers with slow IOR, as they directed the eyes away from the most recently attended area of text. Forward-directed eye movements (saccades), by contrast, were not a function of IOR type. Ease of sentence comprehension influenced the size of regressions, but this effect was also independent of IOR type. Multiple mechanisms of spatial attention, including IOR, bias eye movements toward upcoming words in the text during reading.
In Stroop matching tasks, participants indicate whether the color of an object matches the meaning of a color word printed in color. Previously in this journal, Luo (1999) concluded that interference between two incongruent representations of the same attribute (ink color) occurs prior to the response stage. However, this conclusion was based on questionable data analysis. We suggest analyzing the data by separating "same" and "different" responses and then analyzing three congruency conditions within the "different" responses: (a) congruence between word color and word meaning, (b) congruence between word color and object color, and (c) incongruence between word color, word meaning, and object color. In an experiment similar to Luo's, such an analysis revealed that responding was slowest in the first condition. This pattern of results does not fit with previous conclusions regarding this task, but rather indicates that task conflict and response competition contribute to interference. This analysis has implications for matching tasks other than the Stroop matching task.
The hindsight bias is an inability to disregard known outcome information when estimating earlier likelihoods of that outcome. The propensity effect, a reversal of this hindsight bias, is apparently unique to judgments involving momentum and trajectory (in which there is a strongly implied propensity toward a specific outcome). In the present study, the propensity effect occurred only in judgments involving dynamic stimuli (computer animations of traffic accidents vs. text descriptions), and only when foresight judgments were temporally near to (vs. far from) a focal outcome. This research was motivated by the applied question of whether the courtroom use of computer animation increases the hindsight bias in jurors' decision making; findings revealed that the hindsight bias was more than doubled when computer animations, rather than text-plus-diagram descriptions, were used. Therefore, in addition to providing theoretical insights of relevance to cognitive, perceptual, and social psychologists, these results have important legal implications.
Three studies investigated the capacity of negative acknowledgment, the admission of an unfavorable quality, to elicit relatively positive responses. In Study 1, an acknowledgment that a written paragraph was confusing led individuals to rate the paragraph as clearer than they did when no acknowledgment was offered. In Study 2, a foreign speaker was rated as possessing a clearer voice when he acknowledged his strong accent than when he did not. In Study 3, a hypothetical college applicant's acknowledgment of receiving less than stellar high school grades resulted in a more positive evaluation of those grades. The interpersonal risks and benefits of negative acknowledgment as an impression-management strategy are discussed.
Object substitution masking (OSM) refers to impaired target identification caused by common onset, but delayed offset, of a surrounding dot mask. This effect has been hypothesized to reflect reentrant processes that result in the mask replacing the target representation. However, little is known about the depth of processing associated with masked targets in this paradigm. We investigated this issue by examining the effect of OSM on the N400 component of the event-related potential, which reflects the degree of semantic mismatch between a target and its context. Participants read a context word followed by a semantically related or unrelated target word surrounded by dots. As expected, delayed dot offset significantly reduced accuracy in identifying the target. The N400 amplitude was also diminished by OSM. These findings offer the first evidence that substitution interferes with target processing prior to semantic analysis, demonstrating an important difference between OSM and other visual phenomena, such as the attentional blink, in which semantic processing is independent of awareness.
Short-term memory (STM) for signs in native signers consistently shows a smaller capacity than STM for words in native speakers (see Emmorey, 2002, for review). One explanation of this difference is based on the length effect: Short items yield higher spans than items that take longer to pronounce, presumably because of limited processing time. Signs in American Sign Language (ASL) take longer to articulate than English words (Bellugi & Fischer, 1972). This is not problematic in natural language use, because ASL conveys information simultaneously. However, with immediate serial recall, articulation time looms large. Some researchers have argued that articulation time is sufficient to account for the sign-speech difference in STM (Emmorey, 2002; Marschark & Mayer, 1998; Wilson, 2001; Wilson & Emmorey, 1997). If so, then STM capacity is, at its root, governed by a general processing limitation that is not affected by language modality. However, this claim has never been adequately tested. If articulation time does not fully account for the sign-speech difference in STM, then other differences between sign and speech may be important. In particular, because vision and audition have strikingly different information-processing characteristics, the sign-speech difference could be due to perceptually based coding. If so, then the principles governing STM are locally determined and cannot be generalized across language modalities. Recently Boutla, Supalla, Newport, and Bavelier (2004) addressed this question using stimuli that are articulated very rapidly in ASL. The digits 1 through 9 and the letters of the fingerspelling alphabet in ASL are produced with the fingers of one hand without large-scale movement, and therefore can be produced very quickly. However, the hand shapes for the digits 1 through 9 in ASL are similar, and formational similarity reduces
What information is used for sorting pictures of complex stimuli into categories? We applied a reverse correlation method to reveal the visual features mediating categorization in humans and baboons. Two baboons and 6 humans were trained to sort, by species, pictures of human and baboon faces on which random visual noise was superimposed. On ambiguous probe trials, a human-baboon morph was presented, eliciting "human" responses on some trials and "baboon" responses on others. The difference between the noise patterns that induced the two responses made explicit the information mediating the classification. Unlike the humans, the baboons based their categorization on information that closely matched that used by a theoretical observer responding solely on the basis of the pixel similarities between the probe and training images. We show that the classification-image technique and principal components analysis provide a method to make explicit the differences in the information mediating categorization in humans and animals.
The standard bottleneck model of the psychological refractory period (PRP) assumes that the selection of the second response is postponed until the first response has been selected. Accordingly, dual-task interference is attributed to a single central-processing bottleneck involving decision and response selection, but not the execution of the response itself. In order to critically examine the assumption that response execution is not part of this bottleneck, we systematically manipulated the temporal demand for executing the first response in a classical PRP paradigm. Contrary to the assumption of the standard bottleneck model, this manipulation affected the reaction time for Task 2. Specifically, reaction time for Task 2 increased with execution time for Task 1. This carryover effect from Task 1 to Task 2 provides evidence for the notion that response execution can be part of the processing bottleneck.
Luce's (1959, 1963) choice model was used to characterize individual differences in men's perception of women's affect as friendly, sexually interested, sad, or rejecting. Women's clothing styles were associated with differences in the model's parameters. Sensitivity to sadness, rejection, and friendliness declined when women were dressed provocatively, whereas sensitivity to sexual interest increased. Provocative clothing was also associated with an increased bias to assume that positive affect was sexual interest rather than friendliness. Men at risk for perpetrating sexual aggression were less sensitive to women's affect than low-risk men were. They were also more likely than low-risk men to associate provocative clothing with sexual interest, and conservative clothing with friendliness. Results indicate that heterosocial perception may help to predict sexually coercive behavior and may be an important target for intervention.
Short-term memory (STM) is thought to be limited in capacity to about 7 ± 2 items for linguistic materials and 4 ± 1 items for visuospatial information (Baddeley & Logie, 1999; Cowan, 2001). Recently, we (Boutla, Supalla, Newport, & Bavelier, 2004) challenged this dichotomy between linguistic and visuospatial STM by showing that STM capacity in users of American Sign Language (ASL) is also limited to about 4 or 5 items. This finding suggests that although longer spans appear for speech, spans are not necessarily longer for linguistic materials across all modalities. Wilson and Emmorey (2006) responded that because we evaluated span using digits for English speakers and letters for ASL signers, the difference we reported might have stemmed from stimulus selection rather than language modality. Here we address this claim by reporting an experiment in which we reexamined STM span in English speakers using letters and compared the outcome with results we and Wilson and Emmorey have obtained for ASL signers. It is important to note that the discrepancy between our previous results and those of Wilson and Emmorey is not in the obtained span in signers found by all parties to be around 4 to 5 items (Fig. la). Rather, Wilson and Emmorey disputed whether the digit span of 7 ± 2 in speakers is an appropriate benchmark for comparison with signers. Using letters to measure span in speakers, they found a span of only 5.3, comparable to that of signers. They suggested that there is no difference in span between the two languages. Here we show that their result is not due to their use of letters instead of digits. Rather, in selecting letters that are translations of one another in English and ASL, Wilson and Emmorey failed to control the stimuli in each language for phonological factors known to affect span size. One such crucial factor is phonological similarity. The finding that span is longer for digits than for letters in English speakers is not new (Cavanaugh, 1972). However, this difference has been attributed to the greater phonological similarity of letter names than digit names in English (Conrad & Hull, 1964; Mueller, Seymour, Kieras, & Meyer, 2003). In our previous study, we used letters with signers and digits with speakers to match stimuli in this important regard. Finger-spelled letters are less phonologically similar than number signs in ASL and therefore are more comparable to digits in English speakers. To demonstrate that there is nothing special about letters versus digits, other than the fact that many letter names are highly similar in English (e.g., bee, dee, ee, gee) and thus prone to produce shorter spans, we show here that when phonologically controlled letter materials are used with English speakers, the span of speakers returns to the typical 7 ± 2 range and continues to contrast with the span of signers.