Journal Article Some Reminiscences Get access Gottfried Haberler Gottfried Haberler American Enterprise Institute Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 90, Issue 1, February 1976, Pages 9–13, https://doi.org/10.2307/1886081 Published: 01 February 1976

I. Introduction, 505—. II. The backward-looking system and Kendrick's system, 506.

Journal Article A Model of Location and Industrial Efficiency with Free Entry Get access J. M. A. Gee J. M. A. Gee The University, Dundee Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 90, Issue 4, November 1976, Pages 557–574, https://doi.org/10.2307/1885321 Published: 01 November 1976

I. Introduction, 138. — II. The model, 139. — III. Effect of a change in the tax schedule, 142. — IV. Example: A linear savings function, 145. — V. The optimum tax according to the maximin criterion, 148. — VI. Final comment, 149.

Journal Article Stock Market Optimality: Comment Get access Stephen F. LeRoy Stephen F. LeRoy Federal Reserve Board Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 90, Issue 1, February 1976, Pages 150–155, https://doi.org/10.2307/1886091 Published: 01 February 1976

In his recent paper entitled The Structure of Exchange in Barter and Monetary Economies,' R. M. Starr examined the structure of exchange in barter and monetary economies on the assumption of the classical dichotomy to demonstrate the superiority of the latter to the former in some appropriate sense. In particular, in Corollary 2 to Theorem 3 he proved that the class of all barter exchanges that are monotonically-excess-demand-diminishing, excess-demand-fulfilling, and price-consistent at prices p, is smaller, in set-theoretic sense, than the family of the real counterpart of a monetary exchange having those properties at PM. Though this is clearly the comparison of the structure of exchange at equilibrium prices, the greater flexibility of monetary trade is not confined to trade at equilibrium prices. That is, we can further prove that the class of all barter exchanges that are monotonically-excess-demand-diminishing and price-consistent at an arbitrary price system p is smaller, again in set-theoretic sense, than the family of the real counterpart of a monetary exchange having those two properties at an arbitrary pM; that is, the following

I. Classical demand analysis and cross-sectional price elasticities, 509.—II. Price discrimination and the new theory of demand, 510.—III. Conclusion, 512.

I. Introduction, 619.—II. The analysis, 620.—III. Implications, 627.

I. Introduction, 599.—II. Sharecropping, 601.—III. Work conditions: the rat race, 603.—IV. Statistical discrimination, 606.—V. Caste and group organizations, 608.—VI. Conclusions, 617

I. Introduction, 651.—II. The model of borrowing behavior, 652.—III. Lender and market behavior under competitive conditions, 658.—IV. Market solutions under monopoly, 663.—V. Conclusion, 664.—VI. Appendix, 665.