Knowledge that Transforms

We examine whether disproportionate insider control, or the divergence between insider voting and cash flow rights at dual-class firms, influences the extent to which stock price reflects information about future firm performance. We find that current returns incorporate less information about future earnings and cash flows as disproportionate insider control increases. However, monitoring by influential institutional investors, strong board oversight, and high-quality disclosure significantly attenuate this effect, such that disproportionate insider control does not result in less informative stock prices. Collectively, our findings reveal that, although the dual-class structure is associated with less informative stock prices, on average, monitoring and disclosure can alleviate investor concerns about disproportionate insider control while allowing firms to take advantage of the benefits of a dual-class ownership structure.

Anti-recharacterization laws significantly increase the rights of securitization creditors by allowing the buyers of securitized assets to exclusively and immediately seize collateral in bankruptcy. However, strengthening the rights of securitization creditors can limit other creditors’ ability to recover loans. We find that, after a state adopts an anti-recharacterization law, local banks operating in the same state accrue more loan loss provisions, tighten their loan contracts, and incur higher future loan charge-offs. These findings are consistent with the argument that a safe harbor for securitization transactions advantages Wall Street-style structured finance at the expense of Main Street-style lending.

This study investigates how audit firm-level spatial licensing requirements affect audit market competition and audit quality, focusing on small (triennially inspected) audit firms, for which licensing frictions are most relevant. Exploiting the staggered state-level adoption of CPA firm mobility provisions that remove spatial licensing barriers, we find that adoption increases competition among small audit firms, as reflected by lower market concentration and greater first-time entry by small out-of-state auditors. Firm mobility adoption also improves audit quality, as indicated by a lower likelihood of client misstatements. These effects are concentrated in less competitive audit markets and among auditors with higher PCAOB deficiency rates. Audit quality improvements extend to both incumbent auditors and new out-of-state entrants, and we find no evidence of audit fee discounting. Overall, our results suggest that removing spatial licensing barriers fosters a more competitive small audit firm market while improving audit outcomes, without increasing audit costs.

This study examines whether Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to the Securities and Exchange Commission convey value-relevant information about publicly traded firms and whether sophisticated investors trade on that information. Our empirical analysis reveals heterogeneous value relevance associated with different types of requests. Specifically, requests submitted by proxy agents to probe for ongoing investigations as well as anonymous requests are negatively correlated with future returns, while requests from institutional investors and intellectual property entities are associated with positive future returns. Our results also support the direct-trading hypothesis, showing institutional investors and short sellers trade on FOIA-obtained information. Our findings add to the information-acquisition literature by highlighting the heterogeneous value signals in FOIA requests, particularly the negative value signals.

We examine whether negative news media coverage of peer audit firms affects audit quality by mitigating the contagion effect of low-quality audits. We find that when a company issues a restatement, other companies served by the same audit office or within the same city are more likely to subsequently issue a restatement. However, we find that higher negative peer firm news coverage mitigates this contagion effect, particularly when auditors have greater opportunity to improve audit quality (smaller companies) and when media attention amplifies reputational pressures (higher local news intensity). Our findings extend to litigation-related news but not to nonnegative news, suggesting that auditors respond to perceived reputational threats stemming from negative news. Additionally, negative peer news increases auditor attention, consistent with an auditor supply-side effect that improves audit quality. Our findings highlight the media’s role as an informal oversight mechanism.

We examine how labor market competition affects the quality of workplace information on social media. Using employer reviews on Glassdoor for U.S. publicly listed firms from 2011 to 2022, we find that reviews become less informative about actual workplace practices when firms face more intense competition for labor, consistent with competition inducing workplace information management. The decline in review informativeness is more pronounced when employees have narrower external networks, when firms are less unionized, and when firms have a smaller review base, suggesting that workplace information management is more likely when labor market information asymmetry is greater. Additional analyses show that positive reviews in highly competitive labor markets predict higher short-term labor inflows but greater subsequent employee turnover, indicating a gap between managed expectations and actual workplace conditions. Taken together, our evidence suggests that labor market competition potentially distorts the crowdsourced signals available to job seekers on anonymous review websites.

We study whether exogenous improvements in stock liquidity, unrelated to the information environment, affect managers’ disclosure choices. We exploit the 1997 Nasdaq reforms, which exogenously improved stock liquidity by reducing the non-information asymmetry components of the bid-ask spread, and find that Nasdaq firms reduced voluntary disclosure relative to a control group of unaffected firms. This evidence is consistent with managers substituting between components of the bid-ask spread when forming disclosure choices. Specifically, as the non-information asymmetry components decline, managers respond by decreasing disclosure, which in turn raises the information asymmetry component. Despite the reduction in disclosure and corresponding increase in information asymmetry, total stock liquidity nevertheless improves, suggesting that maintaining prior disclosure levels would have yielded minimal marginal benefits.

We examine the association between permissible non-audit services provided by auditors and the timeliness of earnings announcements. Although earnings announcements are unaudited, audit progress influences management’s ability to release earnings while maintaining confidence in reported results. We posit that non-audit services generate earnings announcement timeliness benefits by improving the efficiency and timing of audits through knowledge transfer. We find that tax non-audit services are associated with timelier earnings announcements while nontax non-audit services are not. These benefits are concentrated in the pre-regulatory period before changes in the mid-2000s. Following these changes, the association persists for firms with weaker information environments, poorer performance, and greater audit-related challenges. Overall, our findings show that auditor-provided tax services are associated with enhanced timeliness of unaudited disclosures and that these benefits vary across firms and over time, highlighting previously undocumented spillovers from non-audit services with implications for academic research and regulation.

We study the impact of an online market’s policy (environmental policy) offering entrepreneurs the option to disclose their environmental engagement on entrepreneurship outcomes, using Kickstarter as a laboratory. Following the policy’s implementation, 32.4% of entrepreneurs opted to disclose their environmental commitments. Using the passage of the environmental policy as an instrument, we show that environmental commitment improves funding outcomes, with the funding success rate increasing by 13.2% and the pledged funding ratio by 8.7%. Environmental commitment also attracts more environmentally conscious backers and brings in new backers, which likely contributes to these improved outcomes. However, environmental commitment does not have a material impact on the ultimate project success rate and significantly delays project delivery. Overall, the evidence suggests that Kickstarter’s nudge policy encourages entrepreneurs’ environmental engagement and helps them expand access to environmentally conscious backers by internalizing backers’ environmental preferences.