Knowledge that Transforms

Journal Article Further Notes on Index Numbers: I Get access H. Staehle H. Staehle Geneva Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 3, Issue 2, February 1936, Pages 153–155, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967510 Published: 01 February 1936

Further Notes on Index Numbers: III. A Reply Get access A. P. Lerner A. P. Lerner London Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 3, Issue 2, February 1936, Pages 157–158, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967512 Published: 01 February 1936

Journal Article Further Notes on Index Numbers: II. Mr. Lerner's Supplementary Limits for Price Index Numbers Get access M. F. W. Joseph M. F. W. Joseph Geneva Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 3, Issue 2, February 1936, Pages 155–157, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967511 Published: 01 February 1936

Journal Article Italian Attempts to Encourage Population Growth Get access D. V. Glass D. V. Glass London Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 3, Issue 2, February 1936, Pages 106–119, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967501 Published: 01 February 1936

Journal Article Further Notes on Elasticity of Substitution: II. Dr. Machlup's Commonsense of the Elasticity of Substitution Get access Joan Robinson Joan Robinson Cambridge Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 3, Issue 2, February 1936, Pages 148–150, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967507 Published: 01 February 1936

I should like to correct an error which slipped into my article, “The German Bank Act of 1934,” in Vol. II, No. 3, of this Review, p. 217. The phrase, “This ratio also implies a limit, but in contrast to the cash ratio, it is a maximum limit” should read: “This ratio is imposed by the law as a minimum, as in the case of the cash ratio; but in reality it will figure as a maximum as long as the cash ratio is. far from being reached, and the assets forming this second line of defence will be the only means to fill up the first.” The remainder of the paragraph shows the reasons for this assumption.

Journal Article Commodity Stocks and Equilibrium Get access L. M. Lachmann L. M. Lachmann London Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 3, Issue 3, June 1936, Pages 230–234, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967631 Published: 01 June 1936

Journal Article Distribution and Economic Progress: A Revised Version Get access J. R. Hicks J. R. Hicks Cambridge Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 4, Issue 1, October 1936, Pages 1–12, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967656 Published: 01 October 1936

Journal Article The Place of Interest in the Theory of Production Get access Oskar Lange Oskar Lange Ann Arbor, Michigan Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 3, Issue 3, June 1936, Pages 159–192, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967626 Published: 01 June 1936

Professor Slutsky's Theory of Consumers' Choice Get access R. G. D. Allen R. G. D. Allen London Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 3, Issue 2, February 1936, Pages 120–129, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967502 Published: 01 February 1936