To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
8 results ✕ Clear filters

New Orders and Asset Prices

Review of Financial Studies 2013 26(1), 115-157
[We investigate the asset pricing and macroeconomic implications of the ratio of new orders (NO) to shipments (S) of durable goods. NO/S measures investment commitments by firms, and high values of NO/S are associated with a business cycle peak. We find that NO/S proxies for a short-horizon component of risk premia not identified in prior work. Higher levels of NO/S forecast lower excess returns on equities and many types of bonds, at horizons from one month to one year. These effects are generally robust to the inclusion of common return predictors and are significant on an out-of-sample basis as well. We also address the term structure of risk premia by constructing a similar ratio to measure longer-term investment commitments, which predicts returns primarily at longer horizons.]

Shackling Short Sellers: The 2008 Shorting Ban

Review of Financial Studies 2013 26(6), 1363-1400
[In September 2008, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) temporarily banned most short sales in nearly 1,000 financial stocks. We examine the ban's effect on market quality, shorting activity, the aggressiveness of short sellers, and stock prices. The ban's effects are concentrated in larger stocks; there is little effect on firms in the lower half of the size distribution. Although shorting activity drops by about 77% in large-cap stocks, stock prices appear unaffected by the ban. All but the smallest quartile of firms subject to the ban suffer a severe degradation in market quality.]

The Price of Diversifiable Risk in Venture Capital and Private Equity

Review of Financial Studies 2013 26(8), 1853-1889
[This paper demonstrates how the principal-agent problem between venture capitalists and their investors (limited partners) causes limited partner returns to depend on diversifiable risk. Our theory shows why the need for investors to motivate VCs alters the negotiations between VCs and entrepreneurs and changes how new firms are priced. The three-way interaction rationalizes the use of high discount rates by VCs and predicts a correlation between total risk and net of fee investor returns. We take our theory to a unique data set and find empirical support for the effect of the principal-agent problem on equilibrium private equity asset prices.]

New Orders and Asset Prices

Review of Financial Studies 2013 26(1), 115-157
This paper investigates the behavior of the ratio of new orders to shipments of durable goods (NO/S). High levels of NO/S are associated with a business cycle peak. They predict a short-run increase in employment and fixed and inventory investment but a dramatic long-run decline in employment, fixed investment, inventories, and GDP as a whole. We also find that NO/S captures time-varying risk premia. Higher levels of NO/S forecast lower excess returns on a broad set of assets, including equities, longand intermediate-term Treasury bonds, and high- and low-grade corporate bonds, at horizons from one month to one year. These effects are robust to the inclusion of all common return predictors. We then construct an equilibrium model of investment with time to plan and a countercyclical price of risk which implies that the ratio of new orders to shipments is procyclical and predicts lower excess returns.

Using Option Prices to Infer Overpayments and Synergies in M&A Transactions

Review of Financial Studies 2013 26(3), 695-722
[In this paper, we use call option prices to identify synergies and news from merger and acquisition (M&A) transaction announcements. We find that M&A announcements result in large and approximately equal gains to the bidder and the target on average, with the combined gains being large enough to justify the premium paid to target shareholders. On average, M&A announcements release good news about targets, but bad news about bidders. This suggests that market prices understate true synergy gains, and helps reconcile the generally negative market-based evidence on value-creation in takeovers with their continued prominence in everyday business strategy.]

Shackling Short Sellers: The 2008 Shorting Ban

Review of Financial Studies 2013 26(6), 1363-1400
In September 2008, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) temporarily banned most short sales in nearly 1,000 financial stocks. We examine the ban's effect on market quality, shorting activity, the aggressiveness of short sellers, and stock prices. The ban's effects are concentrated in larger stocks; there is little effect on firms in the lower half of the size distribution. Although shorting activity drops by about 77% in large-cap stocks, stock prices appear unaffected by the ban. All but the smallest quartile of firms subject to the ban suffer a severe degradation in market quality.

The Price of Diversifiable Risk in Venture Capital and Private Equity

Review of Financial Studies 2013 26(8), 1854-1889
This paper demonstrates how the principal-agent problem between venture capitalists and their investors (limited partners) causes limited partner returns to depend on diversifiable risk. Our theory shows why the need for investors to motivate VCs alters the negotiations between VCs and entrepreneurs and changes how new firms are priced. The three-way interaction rationalizes the use of high discount rates by VCs and predicts a correlation between total risk and net of fee investor returns. We take our theory to a unique data set and find empirical support for the effect of the principal-agent problem on equilibrium private equity asset prices.

Using Option Prices to Infer Overpayments and Synergies in M&A Transactions

Review of Financial Studies 2013 26(3), 695-722
In this paper, we use call option prices to identify synergies and news from merger and acquisition (M&A) transaction announcements. We find that M&A announcements result in large and approximately equal gains to the bidder and the target on average, with the combined gains being large enough to justify the premium paid to target shareholders. On average, M&A announcements release good news about targets, but bad news about bidders. This suggests that market prices understate true synergy gains, and helps reconcile the generally negative market-based evidence on value-creation in takeovers with their continued prominence in everyday business strategy.