Knowledge that Transforms

To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:

Debiasing the Curse of Knowledge in Audit Judgment.

The Accounting Review 1995 70(2), 249-273
Abstract Examines the `curse of knowledge' in audit judgment and the extent to which it is mitigated by accountability, experience and counterexplanation. Occurrence of curse of knowledge when individual are unable to disregard information already processed; Audit implications; Debiasing information.

Detecting Earnings Management.

The Accounting Review 1995 70(2), 193-225 open access
Abstract Evaluates alternative accrual-based models for detecting earnings management. Comparison of the specification and power of commonly used test statistics; Application of the models to a random sample of firm-years; Importance of controlling for financial performance when investigating earnings management stimuli that are correlated with financial performance.

The Resolution of Technical Default

The Accounting Review 1995 70(2), 337-353
[Although costs of default underpin the debt covenant hypothesis, prior research provides limited evidence of their nature, magnitude, and impact on shareholder wealth. We show that announcements of technical default are associated with significant stock price declines. Combining post-default changes in terms of debt contracts with stock returns, we examine whether the consequences arising from renegotiation of lending agreements are priced in the market, and estimate that higher costs of borrowing and new restrictions on firms' opportunities impose wealth losses of 1.4% on shareholders. Leverage measures, frequently used in accounting research as proxies for economic effects of debt contracts, are found to be poor surrogates for default or renegotiation costs.]

Trading Volume and Belief Revisions That Differ among Individual Analysts

The Accounting Review 1995 70(4), 581-597
[This study examines the association between trading volume and belief revisions. Most trading volume theories suggest that investors' differential belief revisions cause trading volume. A belief revision is differential if it changes the position of an individual's expectation relative to the distribution of expectations held by others. Thus, I use the correlation between the relative positions of individual analysts' current and prior forecasts of earnings to measure differential belief revisions. In a multiple regression analysis, this correlation measure explains trading volume beyond that explained by prior dispersion in forecasts, which is consistent with Karpoff's (1986) prediction that trading is caused by both differential prior beliefs and differential belief revisions.]