To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
8 results ✕ Clear filters

Current Cost and ACRS Depreciation Expense: A Comparison

The Accounting Review 1984 59(4), 690-701
[Accounting policy makers and taxation authorities have been concerned with the understatement of depreciation expense that can accompany the use of generally accepted depreciation procedures. In addressing this concern, the taxation authorities have adopted a new method of historical cost depreciation known as the Accelerated Cost Recovery System (ACRS). Accounting policy makers, on the other hand, have addressed the "underdepreciation" issue with an experimental program of current cost depreciation disclosure. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the depreciation charges associated with the ACRS and current cost depreciation systems. The results of the analysis show that, for a variety of growth and price change conditions, the ACRS and current cost procedures can provide similar depreciation charges. As such, the ACRS techniques can alleviate considerably the "underdepreciation" effects that have been associated with some of the traditional historical cost depreciation methods.]

On the Use of Entry Requirements for Undergraduate Accounting Programs.

The Accounting Review 1984 59(3), 496-504
In response to ever-increasing enrollments, the accounting faculty of the University of Missouri-Columbia (UMC) instituted a 2.60 overall grade-point average (GPA) requirement for entry into its undergraduate curriculum. This standard has now been in effect for approximately five years and has had the expected result of decreasing enrollments by 30-35 percent. However, questions about the equity of the standard have been raised, especially regarding transfer and nontransfer students. To address these issues, the relationships between 11 independent variables and the subsequent performance of 400 UMC undergraduate accounting students were studied. The results indicate that entering GPA is the single best predictor of subsequent academic performance, although certain other factors (especially in the case of transfer students) also appear to be useful in this regard.

Current Cost and ACRS Depreciation Expenses: A Comparison.

The Accounting Review 1984 59(4), 690-701
Accounting policy makers and taxation authorities have been concerned with the understatement of depreciation expense that can accompany the use of generally accepted depreciation procedures. In addressing this concern, the taxation authorities have adopted a new method of historical cost depreciation known as the Accelerated Cost Recovery System (ACRS). Accounting policy makers, on the other hand, have addressed the "underdepreciation" issue with an experimental program of current cost depreciation disclosure. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the depreciation charges associated with the ACRS and current cost depreciation systems. The results of the analysis show that, for a variety of growth and price change conditions, the ACRS and current cost procedures can provide similar depreciation charges. As such, the ACRS techniques can alleviate considerably the "underdepreciation" effects that have been associated with some of the traditional historical cost depreciation methods.