The article discusses the implications of measurement theory on accounting concept formulation. Measurement is a term of common usage in contemporary accounting literature. However, inclusion of the word in accounting terminology appears to have preceded any thoroughgoing analysis of measurement's essential meaning and corresponding implications to the discipline. The purpose of this article is to analyze some deficiencies in accounting thought inferred by the perception of accounting as an explanatory discipline that utilizes measurement as its primary mode of description. As a corollary objective, these problems will be related to some objectives for future accounting research. Correspondent with this objective is the responsibility of accountants, in both research and practice, for the explanatory significance of the numbers and statements issuing from accounting procedures. Accounting research literature is replete with alternative formulations of specific accounting concepts or percepts. On the other hand, analytical research at the metatheoretical level of definitional problems in accounting is virtually non-existent.

The purpose of this article is to present an example of a discussion concerning the accounting model in terms of a computer environment. The instructor of accounting or data processing gets an opportunity to introduce, review or reinforce the student's understanding and use of the accounting model by way of using the model as a means of exploring the computer processing of one and two-dimensional arrays and the use of subroutine subprograms if a course in computers and electronic data processing is included in the business curriculum. This opportunity is especially significant in view of the fact that the curriculum in the college of business is often viewed by the student as a series of unrelated and isolated topics. Certainly, the realities of the situation would suggest that computers and accounting should be discussed simultaneously and not as two separate and distinct subject matters. Students who have already studied the accounting model might benefit from the review that the discussion provides through an alternative means of viewing the debit and credit structure.

The article reports on Accrued expense tax reform. The accounting profession was not ready in 1954 to govern its own conduct and had no effective means to re strain its clients, especially with regard to estimated expenses. Consequently, the opportunity to conform tax accounting more closely with general accounting was missed. Taxpayers and accountants over the years have kept the accrued expense and deferred income issues alive. There have been frequent court cases for individual items. Recently the American Institute of CPA's Committee on Federal Taxation formally revived these issues by including proposals for reenactment of Sections 432 and 462 in its recommendations to the U.S. Congress. The Statements on Responsibilities in Tax Practice, No. 4 of which was issued in October 1966, represent a very constructive program on the tax side of the picture. These, coupled with educational activities directed toward awareness of the ramifications of taxes, good rapport with the Internal Revenue Service and client education, needs to continue. Client education is certainly important because obviously practitioner accountants cannot carry the whole burden.

The best available indication of the present state of college level auditing education can be deduced by considering widely used textbooks. A recent survey of textbooks used by members of the American Association of Collegiate Schools of Business revealed that the five leading textbooks are used in over eighty-seven percent of, the schools. In all of these books predominant emphasis is placed on verification of financial statement categories and a majority of the chapters are directed to serial treatment of specific general ledger accounts. Within these chapters a great deal of detailed procedural advice is given. There are certain current trends in accounting education, in addition to a preference for conceptual material, that must be considered in shaping the content of the auditing course. There is not room enough for remedial courses in the present accounting curriculum. The auditing course should not be used as a review of accounting theory, which should have been learned in intermediate accounting, and there is not time to cover many features of internal control, which are more appropriately covered in the systems course.

The article discusses the significance of introducing important tax provisions into advanced accounting. Many accounting courses could be improved significantly by the brief introduction of related tax considerations, preferably in a non-technical fashion. This is particularly true in the case of advanced accounting courses wherein consolidated financial reporting for multi-entity organizations is usually given considerable attention. Decisions regarding the form of corporate and tax reporting for multi-entity organizations are highly tax-influenced. Tax planning is the art of determining in advance what tax liability will result and then conducting transactions with a view toward reducing the income tax burden. In the area of multiple corporations' a group has a choice of accomplishing the same results by more than one method-one of which may result in a lower tax liability. In order to minimize the tax burden, however, management must understand the interrelationship between business operations and the tax liability. A chart was first developed as a testing device for an advanced accounting course. Since students performed so poorly on the question it was later utilized successfully as a teaching aid-originally in an advanced course and subsequently in a tax course.