To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
3 results ✕ Clear filters

The Value of Self-Reported Costs in Repeated Investment Decisions

The Accounting Review 1990 65(4), 837-856
[This article describes a model in which an endogenous demand for cost reports exists, and characterizes optimal contracts. A principal employs an agent to implement investment projects. The agent's payments are subject to bankruptcy constraints; that is, the agent's wealth cannot fall below zero. To achieve the cost report perspective, the agent is assumed to acquire and communicate his/her private information after investment and production. The principal usefully incorporates the agent's cost reports within an optimal contract, in spite of two constraining features. First, the agent's information is only about historical costs, which are not informative about future investment opportunities. Second, at no time can the principal verify the agent's cost reports. However, as a substitute for cost verification in our model, the principal and agent can write long-term contracts. Although an unverifiable report is not useful in a one-period setting, in two periods it may become useful. We demonstrate necessary conditions for communication to be valuable in two periods. If single period contracts are used, the principal's residual claim is sometimes less than it would be in a full information setting. This loss occurs if and only if the bankruptcy constraints are binding in one period; that is, they prevent the principal from efficiently selling the firm to the risk-neutral agent. The principal's optimal reaction, given the tightness of the bankruptcy constraints, is either to underinvest or to permit the agent to keep any informational rents. Long-term contracts loosen the bankruptcy constraints because they permit the agent to accumulate wealth. We identify costs and benefits of communication-based two period contracts. Through long-term contracts, the principal makes a tradeoff: he commits to ex post inefficient investment decisions in order to reduce the cost of obtaining truthful reports from the agent. In some cases, production increases, leading to larger cash distributions to both parties. In other cases, production decreases, but the principal's residual increases because the agent's informational rents are reduced.]

The Effect of Honesty and Superior Authority on Budget Proposals

The Accounting Review 2008 83(4), 1083-1099
Research in budgeting suggests that subordinates may exhibit economically significant degrees of honesty, in spite of pecuniary incentives to do otherwise. This study continues the exploration of honesty in budgeting along two dimensions. First, unlike prior experiments, we measure the incremental effect of honesty by manipulating whether budget requests are made in the form of a factual assertion. Second, prior designs may have emphasized the ethical dimension of budgeting by granting the subordinate wide discretion over setting the budget, whereas we manipulate whether the subordinate or the superior has final authority over setting the budget. We find that less slack is created when budget communication requires a factual assertion in the subordinate authority treatment, but not when the superior has final authority. Hence, we find an incremental effect of honesty only when the subordinate has final authority. We conjecture, and provide some evidence, that this is due to subordinates framing the superior authority situation as one of negotiation where each party acts in his or her self-interest, rather than as an ethical dilemma. This view, that budgeting is essentially devoid of ethical considerations, is consistent with some recent characterizations of budget practices.