We show that politically connected banks influence economic activity. We exploit shocks to individual banks’ political capital following close U.S. congressional elections. We find that regional output growth increases when banks active in the region experience an average positive shock to their political capital. The effect is economically large, but temporary, and is due to lower restructuring in the economy, not increased productivity. We show that eased lending conditions (especially for riskier firms) can account for the growth effect. Our analysis is a first attempt to directly link the politics and finance literature with the finance and growth literature. (JEL, D72, E65, G21, G28, O43, O51).

Does partisanship influence loan allocation through the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP)? We examine the 2020 Presidential campaign contributions made by lenders’ employees as a partisanship measure and leverage the PPP’s phased implementation under both the Trump and the Biden administrations. We find that partisan misalignment increases lending, particularly to small and first-time PPP borrowers, as well as those in Republican areas. Misalignment is also associated with higher payroll coverage for small businesses. Our findings are consistent with Republican-leaning lenders viewing the PPP’s 2021 phase as a legacy policy of the prior administration, shedding new light on the partisan-alignment phenomenon in finance.