A two-step procedure for estimating linear simultaneous structural equations with unit roots is presented. It generalizes the procedure of differencing for univariate time series via G. Box and J. M. Jenkins (1970). First, one finds the number of unit roots and the canonical variables that are stationary. Second, one retains only the stationary canonical variables and estimates a stationary model by standard methods. The procedure is easy to use. It is robus t against the difficult testing problem of finding the correct number of unit roots. A multiplier-accelerator model is estimated with interesting conclusions.

Using data on stock price and dividends, and on long-term and short-term interest rates, the authors test an important implication of present value models--that current value is a linear function of the conditional expectations of the next-period value and the current determining variable . This implication, combined with rational expectations, is strongly rejected. Combined with adaptive expectations, it is accepted. The latter model can also explain the observed negative relation between the rate of return and stock price. Thus the rational expectations assumption should be used with caution; the adaptive expectations assumption may be useful in econometric practice. Copyright 1989 by MIT Press.(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

N the study of optimal economic policy using a linear econometric model and a quadratic welfare function the parameters of the model are often assumed to be known for certain. Under this assumption the solution in the form of an optimal feedback equation can be obtained easily. Although one recognizes that in a realistic situation the parameters of an econometric model are never known for certain, he might still apply the above solution, using a set of estimates of the parameters as if they were the true values, if he believes that it is a good approximation to optimal policy. Such a procedure is well known to be a certainty equivalence solution. In a recent paper (Chow, 1973b), I have presented a method of obtaining the optimal feedback equations and the associated welfare costs by allowing for uncertainty in the parameters as expressed in the posterior density function computed from data available at the time of the current decision but not for possible future revision of this posterior density in the derivation of the current policy. Because future learning about the model is not explicitly taken into account in the design of the current policy, the above method is not truly optimal. However if the sample period is long as compared with the planning period, this method will probably be close to being optimal. The purposes of this paper are to present an approximate solution to optimal when learning is taken into account and to contrast this solution with the first two solutions. In the literature, the term control is used for a problem having the dual purpose of improving the system performance and of learning more about the system for the sake of future control. Numerous approximate solutions to this problem have been suggested.' The solution of this paper appears to be the simplest in conception, and yet it incorporates all theoretical elements in the calculations. It contains a logical structure which brings out clearly the effect of learning on the optimization process and enables the effect to be measured numerically. It provides useful contrasts to the certainty equivalence solution and the solution for unknown parameters without learning, being a natural generalization of these two solutions. We will set up the problem and describe the method of solution in section II. This method will be compared in section III with the two other methods just mentioned, both in conceptual terms and in terms of computations. Two simpler, modified versions of the method will also be briefly described. They are simpler to compute but they still take learning partially into account. Some numerical results using a simple one-equation model will be presented in section IV to bring out the effects of learning on the optimal solution. This paper is confined mainly to presenting the method and providing some illustrative calculations. A comprehensive study of the effect of learning on optimal policies using the method of this paper remains to be undertaken. From the viewpoint of economics in general, other than the study of quantitative economic policy using econometric models, the content of this paper may also be relevant. Maximization is in the heart of economics. Most of economic theory assumes maximization to take place in Received for publication December 26, 1973. Revision accented for publication July 8, 1974. * I am much indebted to Andrew Abel for extremely able research assistance, to Edison Tse, Ray C. Fair and several members of the Econometric Research Program seminar at Princeton for valuable suggestions and discussions, to a referee for comments on an early draft, and to the National Science Foundation for financial support through Grant GS32003X. 1 The references in the literature are too numerous to cite. In the economics literature, Prescott (1972) deals with the problem of learning using a very simple model but provides no new method of solution; its results were computed by complete enumeration. MacRae (1972) and Tse (1974) provide interesting approximations to the optimal solution and are highly recommended to the reader.

N this paper, I will generalize the modified Newton method previously applied in Chow (1968) to the computation of full-information maximum likelihood estimates of parameters of a system of linear structural equations to the case of a system of nonlinear structural equations. The success of that method for linear systems 1 has stimulated my present attempt to generalize it for nonlinear systems. The subject of maximum likelihood estimation of nonlinear simultaneous equation systems has been studied by Eisenpress and Greenstadt (1966). There are three main differences between their approach and ours. First, their basic formulation is more general, assuming that all parameters in the system may appear in every equation,2 whereas we assume as the basic setup that there is a distinct set of parameters belonging to each equation. Second, partly because of the first, we are able to obtain simpler and more explicit expressions for the derivatives of likelihood function required in the calculations. Third, and also partly because of the first, we can conveniently deal with the important problem of linear restrictions on the parameters in the same equation or in different equations. A fourth feature of this paper, and a feature which has partly motivated it, is the contrast of the linear with the nonlinear case. As it will be shown, there are many similarities in the computations of both. This demonstration can enhance our understanding of the nature of the estimation equations. Two additional features of this paper are the treatments of identities in the system and of residuals which may follow an autoregressive scheme. We will derive in section II the estimation equations for nonlinear systems, under the assumptions that each structural equation contains a distinct set of parameters, that the parameters are not subject to any linear restrictions, and that the (additive) residuals are serially uncorrelated. Section III treats the special case when some equations are linear, and contrasts this case with the nonlinear case. Section IV deals with identities and linear restrictions on the parameters. Section V is concerned with the problem of autoregressive residuals.

Gregory C. Chow, An-loh Lin, Best Linear Unbiased Interpolation, Distribution, and Extrapolation of Time Series by Related Series, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 53, No. 4 (Nov., 1971), pp. 372-375