Knowledge that Transforms
To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.
Fields:
190 results
✕ Clear filters
Review of the First Quarter of the Year
Review of the Year 1927
The Effect of Correlation Between Weights and Relatives in the Construction of Index Numbers
Review of the Second Quartar of the Year
The Money Market in 1927
Statistical Background of the Crisis Period, 1837-42
N the endeavor previously announced to break ground for a thoroughgoing study of early American crises, which should proceed primarily upon the application of modern methods to the analysis of available statistical data, report has already been made upon various matters which concern the crisis period I837-42 the most extended period of severe misfortune not founded on political difficulties which this country suffered prior to the Civil War. Although some of the studies of particular phenomena have been prolonged beyond the years of recovery following this half-decade of troubled times, data of a statistical character at least covering the important period I830-45 have been collected, analysed, and presented upon the course of commodity prices, volume of public land sales, and market values of the common stocks of railroad and other enterprises.' To these should now be added such material as exists upon changes in the volume of business and upon banking and financial phases of the situation during the sixteen-year interval I830-45, an interval extensive enough to put the crisis period in proper setting while in conclusion the more important statistical series ought to be brought together to exhibit such relationships among them as seem most significant.
A Survey of Post-War Levels of Business Activity
BEFORE we consider the varying advances achieved by various classes of industry since I9I9, it is useful and interesting to review the broad economic aspects of the period through which we have been passing. From our study of the cyclical fluctuations during the past sixty years, we have learned that economic data for that time can not be analyzed as a homogeneous whole. We find that there are certain periods which have been characterized by cyclical swings of great amplitude and much irregularity. There are other periods in which the ups and downs of business have been moderate, but, nevertheless, well defined. This distinction is clearly apparent in the fluctuations of the rates on prime commercial paper from i866 to I9271. During the reconstruction period from i866 to I873, the far reaching after-effects of the Civil War brought about extreme fluctuations in the rates on commercial paper. After a period of relatively narrow fluctuations, there emerged between I890 and I899 another interval characterized by wider variations, when the usual cyclical movements were greatly intensified by the Sherman Silver Purchase Act, by the menace of the free silver episode, and by the outbreak of the Spanish-American War. On the other hand, there were two long intervals in the sixty years under examination when money rates were virtually free from such extreme movements. From I875 to I890 and again from I900 to I9I3, there were periods during which the economic mechanism, having outgrown the influence of the tremendous disturbing forces which immediately preceded, and not being subjected for any considerable interval to the pressure of unusual new elements, settled down to a more stable and regular type of oscillation. The outbreak of the war in I9I4, however, ushered in another period featured by wide movements. Indeed, the war years were so dominated by military demands that critical economic analysis of this period is hindered by many obstacles. It will be noted, however, that during the war ancl post-war years, money rates have not exhibited the same degree of irregular month to month fluctuation which had characterized previous comparable periods. This reflects the influence of the federal reserve system. During I9I9-27, there are new and important elements in the economic situation, for which allowance must be made before one applies the methods of analysis suitable for such a period as I903-I3. The business situation in the United States has been profoundly influenced by the march of post-war developments in Europe, which brought financial upheaval and demoralization of markets. It has become increasingly evident that the United States is not an isolated self-sufficient nation, but, on the contrary, is affected materially by international developments. The fact that our country now has the greatest accumulation of gold in modern times serves to explain certain unusual phases in postwar business conditions. Furthermore, there have been substantial changes in the standard of living in this country, as well as in buying habits. These changes in the standard of living have been of such order as to have important effects on the usefulness of indexes of prices. Available wholesale price indexes are heavily weighted with data for staple basic commodities, and fail to measure the price movements of many of those things which people want to buy. People will deprive themselves in a variety of ways so that they may have automobiles, radios, fur coats, ultra-modern apartments, and other goods of the luxury class. This, then, means that price indexes fail to register adequately the price changes for articles people most desire to buy. It would be possible to cite many additional reasons to show why the period I9I9-27 has been an unusual one, but such enumeration is unnecessary to indicate that the injection of new elements into the compound we call the business situation has necessitated a revised point of
The Production of Electricity as an Index of the Physical Volume of Business
which is free from the influence of prices. Bank debits, which afford the most general index of business activity, measure the dollar volume of transactions made through checks, and hence reflect the prices of goods, services (i.e., wages in general), and securities, as well as the volume of transactions; whereas most series expressed in physical units, however well they may reflect general movements, actually apply to some particular phase of activity, such as freight shipments or manufacturing.
Farm Business Surveys as Sources of Data on Agricultural Income
SINCE the first business survey was made in Tompkins County, New York, in I907 by Cornell University, well over eighty thousand business records have been taken in a total of something like 550 different areas in 45 different states in the United States. Mr. H. W. Hawthorne of the United States Bureau of Agricultural Economics assembled the principal facts for 7 I,55 I of these records in Table 652 (pp. I 285-I3II) in the I925 Yearbook of the United States Department of Agriculture. Since then, he has secured reports of about five thousand more records taken in fifty additional areas, and all the I927 reports are not yet in. It usually takes a year or more to work up the data of such surveys. In addition, there have been several thousands of other records taken in which data have been obtained with a somewhat different use in mind; for example, the progress records taken of settlers in cut-over or reclaimed areas, the progress records of groups of Southern farmers, the records of family living in which is obtained as a check against expenditures. Each of the business records contains an opening and closing inventory and a record of the receipts and expenditures of the year. From these are computed a farm income figure, and a labor income figure, the latter being the estimate resulting from an attempt to determine the return to the proprietor after a reasonable allowance for interest on investment has been deducted. No other industry has available such a large supply of data collected by educational and governmental agencies with avowedly scientific intent. It is not strange, therefore, that most of those interested in estimating the of agriculture have turned to these survey reports as an important source of data. Data from these surveys figured in the findings of the Commission of Agricultural Inquiry,' in the estimates of incomes by the National Bureau of Economic Research,2 and indirectly in the reports of the National Industrial Conference Board and the Business Men's Commission. Workers in the general field of economics are constantly drawing upon these data of income. It is therefore highly desirable that we have a clear idea of their meaning and applicability.