Knowledge that Transforms

To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
1116 results ✕ Clear filters

The Rising Price of Nonmarket Goods

American Economic Review 2003 93(2), 227-232
Nonmarket goods such as unpaid household labor, leisure, health and longevity, and the environment are important components of the standard of living. They represent a large fraction of all activities. Prime-aged men and women spend 17 percent of their day in leisure activities, and 5 and 13 percent of their time, respectively, in unpaid housework compared to 23 and 13 percent of their time, respectively, in paid work. The quantity of nonmarket goods is rising over time. In the United States, life expectancy at birth is now 77 years, having risen by 29 years since 1900. In Los Angeles County between 1980 and 1998, average annual daily exceedences of the national smog standard declined by 60 days from 71 to 11. Falling big-city murder rates merit national news headlines. Studies of living standards have focused on the tremendous change in the quantity of nonmarket goods but have assumed that the value of nonmarket goods, except for unpaid labor, has remained constant. This assumption underlies most health studies (e.g., David Cutler and Elizabeth Richardson, 1997; Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel, 2003; William T. Nordhaus, 2003). Nordhaus (2003) valued declines in mortality since 1900 using a constant value of life. Even the Boskin CPI Commission (Michael J. Boskin et al., 1998) discussed trends in the quantity of nonmarket goods (i.e., pollution and crime progress) without mentioning incorporating such goods’ implicit prices into a broader CPI measure. There is no reason to think that implicit prices or the willingness to pay for nonmarket goods has remained constant. Rising real and shadow wages have made both leisure and unpaid household labor more expensive. Rising incomes have also made such normal goods as safety, health, a temperate climate, and the environment more valuable. We document the price dynamics of nonmarket goods by estimating repeat cross-sectional hedonic regressions. We focus on two important and measurable nonmarket goods: job fatality risk and climate. In both cases we find that both price and quantity have been rising. This evidence is consistent with rising valuation. We use our estimates of job-risk compensating differentials to construct new evidence on long-run trends in value of life. Accounting for price changes affects how we view the retrospective and prospective benefits of medical innovations. A rising value of life implies that marginal improvements in safety and in longevity are becoming more valuable. We report evidence that the price of living in a temperate winter and summer climate has significantly increased over time.

Employer Stock and 401(k) Plans

American Economic Review 2003 93(2), 398-404
The sharp decline in the stock prices of several firms at which employees held a large fraction of their 401(k) plan assets in company stock, including Enron, Global Crossing, Lucent, and Polaroid, has sparked a public-policy debate about investment options in 401(k) plans. At many large firms, particularly those with retirement saving plans that combine elements of an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) with a traditional 401(k), a substantial fraction of defined-contribution retirement-plan assets are held in company stock. Such undiversified holdings are a source of concern because they raise the volatility of the retirement wealth for employees and expose some workers to the prospect of very small retirement values. Holding an undiversified position in employer stock may be particularly costly because of the potential correlation between company stock returns and the value of the worker’s human capital, which may depend on the company’s prospects. This paper reviews the extent of undiversified company-stock investments in 401(k) plans, evaluates the cost of such investments from an employee’s perspective, and discusses a range of policy actions that could address the excessive concentration of retirement plan assets.

Why Don't Prices Rise During Periods of Peak Demand? Evidence from Scanner Data

American Economic Review 2003 93(1), 15-37
We examine retail and wholesale prices for a large supermarket chain over seven and one-half years. We find that prices fall on average during seasonal demand peaks for a product, largely due to changes in retail margins. Retail margins for specific goods fall during peak demand periods for that good, even if these periods do not coincide with aggregate demand peaks for the retailer. This is consistent with “loss-leader” models of retailer competition. Models stressing cyclical demand elasticities or cyclical firm conduct are less consistent with our findings. Manufacturer behavior plays a limited role in the countercyclicality of prices.

Good Day Sunshine: Stock Returns and the Weather

Journal of Finance 2003 58(3), 1009-1032
Psychological evidence and casual intuition predict that sunny weather is associated with upbeat mood. This paper examines the relationship between morning sunshine in the city of a country's leading stock exchange and daily market index returns across 26 countries from 1982 to 1997. Sunshine is strongly significantly correlated with stock returns. After controlling for sunshine, rain and snow are unrelated to returns. Substantial use of weather‐based strategies was optimal for a trader with very low transactions costs. However, because these strategies involve frequent trades, fairly modest costs eliminate the gains. These findings are difficult to reconcile with fully rational price setting.

Founding‐Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500

Journal of Finance 2003 58(3), 1301-1328
We investigate the relation between founding‐family ownership and firm performance. We find that family ownership is both prevalent and substantial; families are present in one‐third of the S&P 500 and account for 18 percent of outstanding equity. Contrary to our conjecture, we find family firms perform better than nonfamily firms. Additional analysis reveals that the relation between family holdings and firm performance is nonlinear and that when family members serve as CEO, performance is better than with outside CEOs. Overall, our results are inconsistent with the hypothesis that minority shareholders are adversely affected by family ownership, suggesting that family ownership is an effective organizational structure.