Knowledge that Transforms

As in other countries, Australian accounting for unincorporated joint ventures varies systematically between firms in different phases in the extractive industries (explorer vs. producer). We argue that these differences in accounting method can be explained by differences in the type of assets and the manner in which they are owned and financed. We hypothesize that when unincorporated joint ventures are financed on a with-recourse basis they will be proportionately consolidated; when they are financed on a non-recourse basis one-line reporting is expected. Empirical results are consistent with this hypothesis and appear to generalize to the real estate industry.

This study reexamines competition, cost structure, and growth opportunities effects on earnings response coefficients and extends this literature in several ways. First, it presents a more refined theoretical motivation for investigating competition and cost structure effects. Second, it introduces new economic factor proxies that confirm prior findings with respect to competition but differ from prior findings with respect to cost structure and growth opportunities. Overall the evidence suggests that accounting earnings reflect information about future economic rents generated by firms' assets-in-place. The evidence also suggests, contrary to prior studies, that accounting earnings are not very informative about firms' growth opportunities.

This paper presents evidence indicating that the magnitude of the post-earnings-announcement drift is positively related to the direct and indirect costs of trading. Share price and annual dollar trading volume are chosen to proxy for the inverse of direct and indirect costs of trading, respectively. Drift is found to be inversely related to both these variables and these relations subsume the previously documented inverse relation between drift and firm size. The paper's evidence suggests that transactions costs are an important determinant of the efficiency of capital markets.

This paper suggests that earnings announcements provide information that allows certain traders to make judgements about a firm's performance that are superior to the judgements of other traders. As a result, there may be more information asymmetry at the time of an announcement than in nonannouncement periods. More information asymmetry implies that bid–ask spreads increase, suggesting that market liquidity decreases at the time of an earnings announcement. Furthermore, informed opinions resulting from public disclosure may lead to an increase in trading volume, despite the reduction in liquidity that accompanies announcements.

A two-date rational expectations model is analyzed. At the first date, traders can privately acquire a costly signal that provides imperfect information about a public report that will be issued at the second date. Equilibrium characterizations are provided for the fraction of traders that become informed and the informativeness of the first-date price, as well as the price change variance and the expected trading volume at the second date. Comparative statics identify how the above variables are influenced by changes in the information content of the public report, and in particular how market phenomena at the public release date are influenced by endogenous prior information acquisition and trading in response to the forthcoming public release.

We analyze Total Quality Management (TQM) from an economic and organizational perspective. We find that TQM is a new organizing technology that is science-based, non-hierarchical, and non-market-oriented. It improves productivity by encouraging the use of science in decision-making and discouraging counter-productive defensive behavior. It also encourages effective creation and use of specific knowledge throughout the organization. Effective implementation of TQM generally requires major changes in all three components of the organizational rules of the game, namely systems for allocating decision rights, performance measurement systems, and reward and punishment systems.

This paper examines accounting changes, costs of default, and accounting-based covenants violated by 130 firms reporting violations in annual reports. I find that managers of firms approaching default respond with income-increasing accounting changes and that the default costs imposed by lenders and the accounting flexibility available to managers are important determinants of managers' accounting responses. I also document that private lending agreements are the first violated, that net worth and working capital restrictions are the most frequently violated restrictions, and that in 52 percent of the cases lenders require concessions from borrowers to resolve default.

This paper investigates circumstances under which accruals are predicted to improve earnings' ability to measure firm performance, as reflected in stock returns. The importance of accruals is hypothesized to increase (i) the shorter the performance measurement interval, (ii) the greater the volatility of the firm's working capital requirements and investment and financing activities, and (iii) the longer the firm's operating cycle. Under each of these circumstances, cash flows are predicted to suffer more severely from timing and matching problems that reduce their ability to reflect firm performance. The results of empirical tests are consistent with these predictions.

Multi-bank holding companies file detailed financial statements on their subsidiary banks. The availability of these data allows for an empirical examination of the relation between accounting-based performance and personnel decision for lower-level managers. For our sample of Texas banks, we find that turnover of subsidiary bank managers is negatively related to subsidiary performance, while promotions are positively related to performance. Holding own-bank performance constant, turnover increases with holding-company performance, which is consistent with the view that turnover decisions are based on performance relative to a firm-specification benchmark.

This paper tests the demand-side prediction of Datar, Feltham, and Hughes (1991) that new issuers of securities are more likely to choose a high-quality auditor and retain a lower level of ownership as the firm-specific riskiness of future cash flows increases. Previous tests of this hypothesis using U.S. data have generally been inconclusive, perhaps because an increase in the riskiness of client cash flows simultaneously increases an auditor's litigation risk and supply price. Our results using data from a significantly different legal environment (Canada) are consistent with the predictions of Datar, Feltham, and Hughes.