The Review of Asset Pricing Studies20177(2), 171-171
Journal Article Announcements Get access The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Volume 7, Issue 2, December 2017, Page 171, https://doi.org/10.1093/rapstu/rax022 Published: 13 November 2017
The Review of Asset Pricing Studies20177(2), 172-208
Our paper investigates extended abnormal returns for S&P 500 index changes in a comprehensive 1979-2015 sample. The literature’s depiction of longer window returns lacked both appropriate nuance and cross-sectional analysis. Solid evidence for reversion appears in the 2000s. Stocks no longer experience permanent shifts in investor demand when they are either added to or removed from the S&P 500. Received April 19, 2016; editorial decision January 23, 2017 by Editor Jeffrey Pontiff
The Review of Asset Pricing Studies20177(2), i3-i3
Journal Article Subscription Page Get access The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Volume 7, Issue 2, December 2017, Page i3, https://doi.org/10.1093/rapstu/rax007 Published: 13 November 2017
Journal Article Announcements Get access The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Volume 7, Issue 1, June 2017, Page 1, https://doi.org/10.1093/rapstu/rax013 Published: 12 May 2017
The Review of Asset Pricing Studies20177(2), 243-277
Corporate loans increasingly have become an important part of portfolio management with the advent of a liquid and transparent secondary market. This paper examines the pricing of characteristics and betas in the cross-section of expected loan returns. Expected loan returns decrease with default beta. Default beta contains information not captured by rating or spread-to-maturity. Among loan characteristics, a 3-month formation momentum strategy earns a monthly premium of 122 bps. Momentum is prominent in loans issued by the lowest-rated borrowers
The Review of Asset Pricing Studies20177(2), 278-315
By using a unique data set on the organizational structure of fixed-income portfolio managers, that is, mutual funds and insurance companies, we study the effects of organizational hierarchy within a fund management team on bond investing. We document that team hierarchies reduce the portfolio managers’ incentive to collect and share soft information. Funds with multiple hierarchies invest less in bonds of local firms, hold less concentrated portfolios, and herd more with the market. Overall, they deliver lower portfolio performances. We also show that changes in fund hierarchy subsequently find their way into fund behaviors.
The Review of Asset Pricing Studies20177(1), 43-80
We specify and estimate a no-arbitrage model for sovereign CDS contracts in which countries’ default intensities depend on economic and financial indicators. To facilitate identification and to distinguish the importance of local and global covariates, we estimate a model with three global and four local covariates using CDS spreads for five maturities and twenty-five countries. The model provides a good fit. The impact of the economic and financial variables on spreads is consistent with economic intuition, and substantially varies across countries and over time. Estimated risk premiums are highly variable and peak during the 2008 financial crisis for most countries.
The Review of Corporate Finance Studies20176(1), cfx009
For articles eventually published in the top twenty academic finance journals and top-tier academic business journals, I examine the acceptance time (the time from first-round submission to final-round acceptance) and online/print publication times (the time from first-round submission to online/print publication). I find that the median acceptance times of the top five general-interest finance journals are: Journal of Financial Economics (9.9 months), Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (10.6 months), Review of Finance (11.7 months), Review of Financial Studies (15.5 months), and Journal of Finance (19.8 months). The three fastest in finance are Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Review of Asset Pricing Studies, and Financial Management. Journal of Finance is one of the slowest top-tier business journals. Large and significant time differences support the editorial differences hypothesis. Received December 14, 2016; editorial decision December 22, 2016 by Editor Paolo Fulghieri.