This paper investigates the long-run performance of global IPOs as compared to purely domestic ones made by US industrial companies. We find that global IPOs not only underperform the market but also underperform their domestic counterparts in the three years after issuance. Moreover, global issues with a larger global tranche are more prone to long-run underperformance. The results are consistent with the window of opportunity hypothesis that investors are overly optimistic about the future prospects of firms engaging in global offerings, and underperformance occurs as unduly high expectations are corrected over time.

This study examines the pricing of global initial public offerings made by US companies as compared to purely domestic offerings. We find that global participation can significantly reduce underpricing by about four percentage points. Moreover, the degree of underpricing declines as larger proportions of shares are allocated to foreign investors. Our results suggest that US companies time their global offerings when foreign demand for US shares is high. There is also evidence that global offerings alleviate the downward pricing pressure associated with new share offerings.