To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
3 results ✕ Clear filters

Has Job Stability Declined Yet? New Evidence for the 1990s

Journal of Labor Economics 1999 17(S4), S29-S64
We update the evidence on changes in job stability through the mid‐1990s, using recently released Current Population Survey data for 1995 that parallel earlier job tenure supplements. In the aggregate, job stability declined modestly in the first half of the 1990s. Moreover, the relatively small aggregate changes mask rather sharp declines in stability for workers with more than a few years of tenure. Nonetheless, the data available to this point do not support the conclusion that the downward shift in job stability for more tenured workers, and the more modest decline in aggregate job stability, reflect long‐term trends.

Job Stability in the United States

Journal of Labor Economics 1997 15(2), 206-233
Two key attributes of a job are its wage and its duration. Much has been made of changes in the wage distribution in the 1980s but little attention has been given to job durations since Robert E. Hall (1972, 1982). The authors fill this void by examining the temporal evolution of job retention rates in U.S. labor markets using data assembled from the sequence of Current Population Survey job tenure supplements. There have been relative declines in job stability for some of the groups that experienced the sharpest declines in relative wages. However, the authors find that aggregate job retention rates have remained stable. Copyright 1997 by University of Chicago Press.

Inertia, Market Power, and Adverse Selection in Health Insurance: Evidence from the ACA Exchanges

The Review of Economics and Statistics 2025
We study how inertia interacts with market power and adverse selection in health insurance. We incorporate inertia into a model of plan selection and price competition, and estimate it using data from the California ACA exchange. We estimate inertia costs equaling 26% of average premiums. Our simulations indicate that inertia exacerbates market power, but has minimal interaction with selection. Eliminating inertia reduces average premiums by 6.6%. Maintaining premium-linked subsidies or reducing consumer churn increases the impact of inertia by enhancing market power. Provider network attachment is an important impediment to plan switching, but substantial inertia remains after accounting for networks.