This study documents one effect of the theory of implicit taxes, providing evidence that a change in the tax rate results in a change in pre-tax returns. Yield spreads of pairs of Treasury bills maturing in the last week of December and the first week of January are examined. Year-ends not affected by rate changes show a significant positive yield spread between these pairs of bills, reflecting an upward-sloping yield curve. However, for year-ends coinciding with the tax rate reductions of 1981 and 1986 there is a significant negative yield spread between these pairs of bills.

Investigates whether accounting earnings of American corporations are managed in response to changes in the statutory corporate income tax rate brought about by the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (TRA). Reducing the maximum corporate tax rate from 46% to 34% through TRA; Concept of earnings management in relation to tax rate reductions in the TRA.

We investigate how cross-country differences in financial accounting standards affect the relation between financial accounting earnings and real economic value-relevant events that underlie those earnings. Based on previous research and economic theory we hypothesize that, because of differences in legal systems and the demand for accounting information, differences in legal protection for external shareholders, and differences in the degree of tax conformity in our sample countries, accounting earnings in the UK and the US will be more closely related to underlying economic activity than will accounting earnings in France and Germany. Empirical results are generally consistent with our hypothesis.

We examine whether differences in international capital mobility across countries are related to country‐specific differences in financial reporting environments. We hypothesize that countries where financial accounting environments lead to greater disclosure of value‐relevant accounting information are more likely to have higher international capital mobility. The results of empirical tests are consistent with our hypothesis.

Differences between SIC codes assigned to companies by COMPUSTAT and CRSP are examined. Large differences are observed at two-, three-, and four-digit levels. Correlations of intra-industry monthly stock returns are larger, and variances of intra-industry financial ratios are smaller for industries based on COMPUSTAT codes. Replication of a portion of Freeman and Tse (1992) produces significant results using COMPUSTAT codes, consistent with the original research, but insignificant results for CRSP codes.

A valuation approach is used to examine the effect of the LIFO inventory method on the relation between the market value of a firm's stock and the book value of equity. The paper develops three competing hypotheses that have different predictions regarding the relation between the LIFO reserve and the market value of equity. Results indicate a significant negative relation between the LIFO reserve and the value of equity, inconsistent with the pricing of LIFO reserves as unbooked assets, but consistent with a model that views the LIFO reserve as a measure of the effect of increases in factor input prices on firm value. Résumé. Les auteurs ont recours à une évaluation pour examiner l'incidence de la méthode DEPS de détermination du coût des stocks sur la relation entre le cours de l'action d'une société et sa valeur comptable. Ils élaborent trois hypothèses concurrentes qui débouchent sur des prédictions différentes en ce qui a trait à la relation entre la réserve résultant de l'utilisation de la méthode DEPS et la valeur marchande de l'entreprise. Les résultats indiquent une relation négative significative entre cette réserve et la valeur comptable de l'entreprise, relation qui ne concorde pas avec le prix de ladite réserve que l'on voudrait assimiler à un actif non comptabilisé, mais qui cadre avec un modèle selon lequel la réserve résultant de l'utilisation de la méthode DEPS est considérée comme une mesure de l'incidence des hausses du prix des intrants sur la valeur de l'entreprise.

We investigate how shareholder-level taxes are capitalized into stock prices using a model that incorporates the investment and payout decisions of a firm and the investment alternatives available to investors. Shareholder taxes affect stock prices both indirectly, via the effect of taxes on corporate investment decisions, and directly, by reducing both the mean and variance of after-tax returns. In our model, tax capitalization is not eliminated by the presence of tax-exempt investors, does not depend on whether equity is composed of contributed capital or retained earnings, and does not depend on the tax rate faced by a hypothetical marginal investor.

Lee (1988) finds that LIFO firms have higher earnings‐price (EP) ratios than non‐LIFO firms despite the income‐reducing effects of LIFO, a result contrary to economic intuition that Lee describes as a “puzzle.” This paper attempts to resolve this puzzle by introducing refined measures of variables that are related to both EP ratios and inventory costing method choices. The improved proxies are analysts' expectations of future growth rather than realized growth, beta computed using a procedure designed to reduce measurement error rather than the usual OLS beta, and leverage as a supplemental risk measure. Further, we control for expected earnings changes, since transitory earnings shocks that are not expected to persist in future earnings affect the numerator of the EP ratio. After controlling for these factors, we find that EP ratios for LIFO firms are actually lower than those of non‐LIFO firms, a result consistent with economic intuition and the result expected by Lee.

We examine the issue prices of small initial public offerings around the 1993 tax law change that reduced the capital gains tax on qualified small business stock. We compare the actual issue price of new stock with a benchmark price that is not affected by the change in capital gains tax. We find that, after controlling for IPO underpricing, the issue prices of qualifying small business stock after the tax rate change are significantly higher than the issue prices before the change. A control sample of nonqualifying firms shows no significant difference in issue prices.

We investigate how shareholder taxes and risk preferences affect both a stock’s expected return, which reflects the capitalization of the dividend tax penalty into stock price, and the fraction of a firm’s stock held by tax-exempt investors. Our model demonstrates that the dividend tax capitalization effect reflects the weighted average tax rate of all investors, where the weighting depends on investors’ risk tolerances. This weighted average tax rate is not affected by the fraction of stock held by tax-exempt investors; however, tax-exempt investor ownership can be correlated with the weighted average tax rate if differences in tax-exempt investor ownership for different stocks reflect differences in investor risk tolerances for those stocks. Our empirical tests are consistent with the model’s predictions, and provide an equilibrium framework for interpreting prior empirical studies in accounting.