From 1989 through 1993, the United Shareholders Association (USA) published its Shareholder 1000 report, which ranked 1000 firms on several dimensions of corporate performance, including shareholder rights and management compensation. We examine two measures reported by the USA of the alignment between managers' and shareholders' interests: a shareholder rights score and a management compensation rating. The associations between these measures and measures of operating performance and investment levels are analyzed. We find evidence that the USA shareholder rights and management compensation scores are significantly and positively associated with measures of operating performance and investment spending. Further tests indicate that USA management compensation scores proxy for aspects of corporate behavior that have significant valuation implications not reflected in financial statements.

Randall Morck, Eduardo Schwartz, David Stangeland, The Valuation of Forestry Resources Under Stochastic Prices and Inventories, The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 24, No. 4 (Dec., 1989), pp. 473-487

We investigate the behavior of stock market indices across 33 countries around political election dates during the sample period 1974–1995. We find a positive abnormal return during the two-week period prior to the election week. The positive reaction of the stock market to elections is shown to be a function of a country’s degree of political, economic and press freedom, and a function of the election timing and the success of the incumbent in being re-elected. In particular, we find strong positive abnormal returns leading up to the elections (i) in less free countries won by the opposition, and (ii) called early and lost by the incumbent government. These results are consistent with the uncertain information hypothesis (UIH) of Brown et al. (Brown, K.C., Harlow, W.V., Tinic, S.M., 1988. Journal of Financial Economics 22, 355–385) and the model of election behavior of Harrington (Harrington, J.E., 1993. The American Economic Review 83, 27–42).