We examine the evolution of accounting regulation by linking disclosure policies and investments in a dynamic voting model. The disclosure policies are the outcome of voting by entrepreneurs, whose preferences are influenced by their investments. The investments are in turn endogenously determined by current and future disclosure policies. Absent external influences, accounting regimes are stable. A disclosure regime of high (low) quality and a strong (weak) economy coexist and reinforce each other. However, regulatory interventions can result in regime changes by changing the entrepreneurs’ expectations, even without direct enforcement. Unexpected shocks could also result in regime changes by impacting economic conditions and hence voter composition. Our analysis provides a framework to study the interaction between accounting regulation and firms’ economic decisions.

We develop a model that predicts corporate investment level increases with investors’ optimism and that the relationship between investment level and executive compensation depends on investor sentiment and other parameters. The empirical test shows that optimism is significantly and positively related to the level of investment and that executive compensation is insignificantly related to the level of investment. The managerial share ownership is positively related to the level of investment, conditional on the degree of optimism. The empirical results suggest that executives make investment decisions that not only cater to investor sentiment but also reflect their own interest in the company.

This study investigates whether and to what extent bank control over firms by their representation on boards of directors and by equity holdings through trust business may affect corporate environmental responsibility. Using a large sample of listed firms in the United States from 2004 to 2016, we find that banker directors with equity affiliation improve firms’ environmental performance scores and such impact is associated with affiliated bank’s shareholdings, investment horizon, and environmental orientation. Additionally, we document that the effects of bank control on firm’s environmental investments is stronger for firms with more short-term institutional investors but weaker for firms with more analyst coverage. Moreover, we find that when firms are financially constrained, banker directors reduce environmental investments. Finally, product-market competition matters for a firm’s environmental strategies as the relation of bank control and environmental investments is more profound under conditions of greater industry competition.