To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:

Schumpeter and Marx on Capitalist Transformation

Quarterly Journal of Economics 1983 98(2), 333
Journal Article Schumpeter and Marx on Capitalist Transformation Get access John E. Elliott John E. Elliott University of Southern California Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 98, Issue 2, May 1983, Pages 333–336, https://doi.org/10.2307/1885629 Published: 01 May 1983

Marx and Schumpeter on Capitalism's Creative Destruction: A Comparative Restatement

Quarterly Journal of Economics 1980 95(1), 45
Despite well-known differences, the respective visions of capitalism's future by Marx and Schumpeter show striking and neglected similarities. This is illustrated, first, by their strong focus upon capitalism's progressive and creative properties; second, by their analyses of capitalism's dysfunctional properties; and third, by their respective analyses of the creatively destructive character of institutional and attitudinal change in advanced capitalism.

Economic Planning Reconsidered

Quarterly Journal of Economics 1958 72(1), 55
Definitional problems, 55. — The structure of economic planning, 61. — The process of economic planning, 67. — Summary and conclusions, 75.

[Discussion of The Economic Effects of Involuntary Uniformity in the Financial Reporting of R&D Expenditures and Accounting for Research and Development Costs: The Impact on Research and Development Expenditures]: A Reply

Journal of Accounting Research 1980 18, 91
Roland E. Dukes, Thomas R. Dyckman, John A. Elliott, [Discussion of The Economic Effects of Involuntary Uniformity in the Financial Reporting of R&D Expenditures and Accounting for Research and Development Costs: The Impact on Research and Development Expenditures]: A Reply, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 18, Studies on Economic Consequences of Financial and Managerial Accounting: Effects on Corporate Incentives and Decisions (1980), pp. 91-95

Accounting for Research and Development Costs: The Impact on Research and Development Expenditures

Journal of Accounting Research 1980 18, 1
In October 1974, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Statement No. 2, Accounting for Research and Development Costs (henceforth FAS2). The essence of the mandated accounting treatment is stated in paragraph 12 of the Statement: All research and development [R&D] costs encompassed by this Statement shall be charged to expense when incurred. This accounting treatment was contrary to the practice followed by many firms which capitalized and amortized R&D costs. The Board's definition of R&D costs is quite inclusive following, with some modifications, the commonly used interpretation by the National Science Foundation. The Board defines R&D, in paragraph 8, as follows:

The Evaluation by the Financial Markets of Changes in Bank Loan Loss Reserve Levels.

The Accounting Review 1991 66(4), 847-861
Examines the information content of announcements of increased reserves for loan loss by Citicorp and other banks, and the later write-off announcement made by the Bank of Boston in 1987. Bank accounting for loan losses; Study of the events surrounding the Citicorp and Bank of Boston announcements; Implication of Citicorp's increase in loan loss reserves.