To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
10 results ✕ Clear filters

Fixed-Effects Dynamic Panel Models, a Factor Analytical Method

Econometrica 2013 81(1), 285-314
We consider the estimation of dynamic panel data models in the presence of incidental parameters in both dimensions: individual fixed-effects and time fixed-effects, as well as incidental parameters in the variances. We adopt the factor analytical approach by estimating the sample variance of individual effects rather than the effects themselves. In the presence of cross-sectional heteroskedasticity, the factor method estimates the average of the cross-sectional variances instead of the individual variances. The method thereby eliminates the incidental-parameter problem in the means and in the variances over the cross-sectional dimension. We further show that estimating the time effects and heteroskedasticities in the time dimension does not lead to the incidental-parameter bias even when T and N are comparable. Moreover, efficient and robust estimation is obtained by jointly estimating heteroskedasticities.

Panel Data Models With Interactive Fixed Effects

Econometrica 2009 77(4), 1229-1279
This paper considers large N and large T panel data models with unobservable multiple interactive effects. These models are useful for both micro and macro econometric modelings. In earnings studies, for example, workers ’ motivation, persistence, and diligence combined to influence the earnings in addition to the usual argument of innate ability. In macroeconomics, the interactive effects represent unobservable common shocks and their heterogeneous responses over cross sections. Since the interactive effects are allowed to be correlated with the regressors, they are treated as fixed effects parameters to be estimated along with the common slope coefficients. The model is estimated by the least squares method, which provides the interactive-effects counterpart of the within estimator. We first consider model identification, and then derive the rate of convergence and the limiting distribution of the interactive-effects estimator of the common slope coefficients. The estimator is shown to be √ NT consistent. This rate is valid even in the presence of correlations and heteroskedasticities in both dimensions, a striking contrast with fixed T framework in which serial correlation and heteroskedasticity imply unidentification. The asymptotic distribution is not necessarily centered at zero. Biased corrected estimators are derived. We also derive the constrained estimator and its limiting distribution, imposing additivity coupled with interactive effects. The problem of testing additive versus interactive effects is also studied. We also derive identification conditions for models with grand mean, time-invariant regressors, and common regressors. It is shown that there exists a set of necessary and sufficient identification conditions for those models. Given identification, the rate of convergence and limiting results continue to hold. Key words and phrases: incidental parameters, additive effects, interactive effects, factor

Inferential Theory for Factor Models of Large Dimensions

Econometrica 2003 71(1), 135-171
This paper develops an inferential theory for factor models of large dimensions. The principal components estimator is considered because it is easy to compute and is asymptotically equivalent to the maximum likelihood estimator (if normality is assumed). We derive the rate of convergence and the limiting distributions of the estimated factors, factor loadings, and common components. The theory is developed within the framework of large cross sections ("N") and a large time dimension ("T"), to which classical factor analysis does not apply.We show that the estimated common components are asymptotically normal with a convergence rate equal to the minimum of the square roots of "N" and "T". The estimated factors and their loadings are generally normal, although not always so. The convergence rate of the estimated factors and factor loadings can be faster than that of the estimated common components. These results are obtained under general conditions that allow for correlations and heteroskedasticities in both dimensions. Stronger results are obtained when the idiosyncratic errors are serially uncorrelated and homoskedastic. A necessary and sufficient condition for consistency is derived for large "N" but fixed "T". Copyright The Econometric Society 2003.

Testing for Parameter Constancy in Linear Regressions: An Empirical Distribution Function Approach

Econometrica 1996 64(3), 597
This paper proposes some tests for parameter constancy in linear regression models with possible infinite variance.Both dynamic and trending regressors are allowed.The tests are based on the empirical distribution function of estimated residuals and are shown to have non-trivial local power against a wide range of alternatives.Within a certain class of alternatives including simple shifts, the tests have higher power for testing the simple shift alternatives.These tests are formulated in such a way that the limiting variables are distribution-free.The residuals may be obtained based on any root-n consistent estimator (under the null) of regression parameters.As part of these results, some weak convergence for weighted sequential empirical processes of residuals is established.

Testing Parametric Conditional Distributions of Dynamic Models

The Review of Economics and Statistics 2003 85(3), 531-549
This paper proposes a nonparametric test for parametric conditional distributions of dynamic models. The test is of the Kolmogorov type coupled with Khmaladze's martingale transformation. It is asymptotically distribution-free and has nontrivial power against root-n local alternatives. The method is applicable for various dynamic models, including autoregressive and moving average models, generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH), integrated GARCH, and general nonlinear time series regressions. The method is also applicable for cross-sectional models. Finally, we apply the procedure to testing conditional normality and the conditional t-distribution in a GARCH model for the NYSE equal-weighted returns.

Estimation of a Change Point in Multiple Regression Models

The Review of Economics and Statistics 1997 79(4), 551-563
This paper studies the least squares estimation of a change point in multiple regressions. Consistency, rate of convergence, and asymptotic distributions are obtained. The model allows for lagged dependent variables and trending regressors. The error process can be dependent and heteroskedastic. For nonstationary regressors or disturbances, the asymptotic distribution is shown to be skewed. The analytical density function and the cumulative distribution function for the general skewed distribution are derived. The analysis applies to both pure and partial changes. The method is used to analyze the response of market interest rates to discount rate changes.

Structural Changes, Common Stochastic Trends, and Unit Roots in Panel Data

Review of Economic Studies 2009 76(2), 471-501
This paper studies the problem of unit root testing in the presence of multiple structural changes and common dynamic factors. Structural breaks represent infrequent regime shifts, while dynamic factors capture common shocks underlying the comovement of economic time series. We examine the modified Sargan-Bhargava (MSB) test in the panel data setting and propose ways to handle multiple structural changes and dynamic factors. Properties of the MSB test under these non-standard conditions are derived. For example, the test statistics are shown to be invariant, in the limit, to mean breaks. This invariance does not carry over to breaks in linear trends, where the test statistics will converge to functionals of weighted Brownian bridges. A simplified test statistic is then proposed, which is invariant to both mean and trend breaks. We further study pooled test statistic based on standardization and combination of p-values. Response surfaces for p-values of all test statistics are computed to facilitate the empirical implementation of the proposed methodology. The pooled tests are shown to have good finite sample performance.

Confidence Intervals for Diffusion Index Forecasts and Inference for Factor-Augmented Regressions

Econometrica 2006 74(4), 1133-1150
We consider the situation when there is a large number of series, N, each with T observations, and each series has some predictive ability for some variable of interest. A methodology of growing interest is first to estimate common factors from the panel of data by the method of principal components and then to augment an otherwise standard regression with the estimated factors. In this paper, we show that the least squares estimates obtained from these factor-augmented regressions are consistent and asymptotically normal if . The conditional mean predicted by the estimated factors is consistent and asymptotically normal. Except when T/N goes to zero, inference should take into account the effect of “estimated regressors” on the estimated conditional mean. We present analytical formulas for prediction intervals that are valid regardless of the magnitude of N/T and that can also be used when the factors are nonstationary.

A PANIC Attack on Unit Roots and Cointegration

Econometrica 2004 72(4), 1127-1177
This paper develops a new methodology that makes use of the factor structure of large dimensional panels to understand the nature of nonstationarity in the data. We refer to it as PANIC-Panel Analysis of Nonstationarity in Idiosyncratic and Common components. PANIC can detect whether the nonstationarity in a series is pervasive, or variable-specific, or both. It can determine the number of independent stochastic trends driving the common factors. PANIC also permits valid pooling of individual statistics and thus panel tests can be constructed. A distinctive feature of PANIC is that it tests the unobserved components of the data instead of the observed series. The key to PANIC is consistent estimation of the space spanned by the unobserved common factors and the idiosyncratic errors without knowing a priori whether these are stationary or integrated processes. We provide a rigorous theory for estimation and inference and show that the tests have good finite sample properties. Copyright The Econometric Society 2004.

Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference for Approximate Factor Models of High Dimension

The Review of Economics and Statistics 2016 98(2), 298-309
An approximate factor model of high dimension has two key features. First, the idiosyncratic errors are correlated and heteroskedastic over both the cross-section and time dimensions; the correlations and heteroskedasticities are of unknown forms. Second, the number of variables is comparable or even greater than the sample size. Thus, a large number of parameters exist under a high-dimensional approximate factor model. Most widely used approaches to estimation are principal component based. This paper considers the maximum likelihood–based estimation of the model. Consistency, rate of convergence, and limiting distributions are obtained under various identification restrictions. Monte Carlo simulations show that the likelihood method is easy to implement and has good finite sample properties.