To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
3 results ✕ Clear filters

Wisdom of crowds before the 2007–2009 global financial crisis

Journal of Financial Stability 2020 48, 100741
Our paper examines whether investor opinions expressed in social media predicted stock returns of financial firms during the 2007–2009 global financial crisis. We conduct a textual analysis of the articles published on the stock market insight website Seeking Alpha before the crisis and find that banks that were described in articles with a higher fraction of negative words experienced (1) sharper drops in stock prices, (2) larger increases in expected default probability, and (3) greater surges in nonperforming loans during the crisis. Our evidence suggests that wisdom of crowds provides valuable information on how banks weather a forthcoming crisis.

Do short sellers exploit risky business models of banks? Evidence from two banking crises

Journal of Financial Stability 2020 46, 100719
We find that changes in short interest predict banks’ stock returns during two recent banking crises. Furthermore, before the 2007–2008 crisis, short interest increased more for banks with worse performance during the Long-Term Capital Management crisis of 1998. We also find that changes in short interest predicted banks’ loan quality and default risk during the 2007–2008 crisis. The results are stronger for banks with higher levels of risk-taking. Overall, our findings indicate that short sellers were informed about the persistent risky business models of banks and shorted those banks before the 2007–2008 crisis.

Governance through trading on acquisitions of public firms

Journal of Corporate Finance 2020 65, 101764
We identify an important channel, acquisitions of public targets, via which the governance through trading (GTT) improves firm values. The disciplinary effect of GTT is more pronounced for firms with higher managerial wealth-performance sensitivity and moderate institutional ownership concentration. Firms with higher GTT also have higher subsequent ROA, ROE, Tobin's Q, analysts forecasted EPS growth rate, and lower expected default risk. The effect is stronger after Decimalization. We conduct several exercises to rule out alternative explanations, such as institutional superior information, investor activism, and momentum. Additional tests show that the disciplinary effect of GTT only exists for less financially-constrained firms and non-all-cash M&As where the agency problem is more likely to be prevalent.