Journal Article General Equilibrium with a Replenishable Natural Resource Get access Vernon L. Smith Vernon L. Smith California Institute of Technology Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 41, Issue 5, December 1974, Pages 105–115, https://doi.org/10.2307/2296374 Published: 01 December 1974
Journal Article Minimization of Economic Rent in Spatial Price Equilibrium Get access Vernon L. Smith Vernon L. Smith Lafayette and Stanford Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 30, Issue 1, February 1963, Pages 24–31, https://doi.org/10.2307/2296027 Published: 01 February 1963
One of the continuing unsolved problems of accounting is that of joint costs of production. Generations of accountants have struggled in the definitional morass of joint products, major products, co-products, minor products, by-products, and scrap, waste, spoiled or defective products. For their part, economists have been quick to point out that, in many cases, cost allocations to joint products are arbitrary and thus unjustified. Be that as it may, for a number of mundane reasons well known to accountants, such as the preparation of balance sheets and income statements, evaluation of inventories, preparation of tax returns and public regulation. Some allocations are required and must be made. It proposes to relate accounting to economic theory and in so doing to make a very limited advance on the problem. In a joint cost situation, one input serves to produce two or more products, these two or more outputs may issue from the production process either in fixed proportions or in variable proportions.
Introduction, 600. — A model of waste reuse, 601. — Prices in the control model, 605. — Conditions for complete and zero recycling, 607. — Pollution under free competition, 608. — Effects of population, 611. — Interpretation as a waste reduction model, 612. — Material production from natural resources, 612. — Summary and discussion of policy, 614.
I. Debt versus equity financing, 452: Investor portfolio choice, 454; Fundamental leverage theorem, 456; Leverage as an externality 456; Effect of no default risk: the “homemade leverage theorem,” 457; Corporate management and the capital markets, 458; Corporate capital budgets as a “public good,” 460. — II. The corporate investor: long-, margin-, and short-risk positions, 462. — Appendix: option financing, 467.
Introduction, 324. — I. The Ellsberg problem, 326. — II. Probabilistic interpretation, 326. — III. Utility interpretation, 327. — IV. Measuring nonmonetary utility, 328.
I. Introduction, 181. — II. The hypotheses, 183. — III. Subjects and experimental procedure, 184. — IV. Experimental results and classical tests of hypotheses, 187. — V. A. Bayesian subjective probability analysis, 197.— Appendix, 199.
I. Introduction, contributions to investment theory, 61. — II. Capital inputs in production theory, 62. — III. Production, using capital goods, with a fixed replacement policy, 66. — IV. Replacement theory, 72. — V. A theory of investment, replacement, and production, 77. — VI. “Overcapacity” and the dynamics of production, 80.— VII. Investment demand and the “acceleration principle,” 83. — VIII. Summary, 86.