This paper considers a general version of the hold-up problem where n agents first make relation-specific investments and then must agree on some collective action. It is shown that first-best solutions exist under a variety of different assumptions about the nature of information asymmetries.

Arguments in favour of self-enforced bans on advertising by professionals often rely on the stylized fact that advertising can communicate information about price but not about quality. This being the case, it is argued that allowing professionals to advertise runs the risk that firms will compete vigorously over price at the expense of the quality of their product. This paper shows that even if price can communicate no information directly about quality, it can do so indirectly because price will be a signal of quality. Because of this, allowing advertising is shown to improve consumer welfare.

Journal Article A Note on the Existence of Single Price Equilibrium Price Distributions in Sequential Search Models Get access William P. Rogerson William P. Rogerson Northwestern University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 54, Issue 2, April 1987, Pages 339–342, https://doi.org/10.2307/2297522 Published: 01 April 1987 Article history Received: 01 May 1986 Accepted: 01 November 1986 Published: 01 April 1987

Journal Article A Note on the Incentive for a Monopolist to Increase Fixed Costs as a Barrier to Entry Get access William P. Rogerson William P. Rogerson Stanford University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 99, Issue 2, May 1984, Pages 399–402, https://doi.org/10.2307/1885536 Published: 01 May 1984

[This paper considers a repeated principal agent relationship where the principal is risk neutral, the agent is risk averse, the principal can borrow or save at a fixed interest rate, and the agent discounts future consumption. It is shown that memory plays a very strong role in every Pareto-optimal contract. Sufficient conditions for Pareto-optimal contracts to exhibit rising or falling wages are identified. Finally, it is shown that the restriction of the agent's access to credit is necessary to achieve a Pareto-optimal outcome. In particular, under every Pareto-optimal contract for every outcome of every period the agent would choose to save some of his wage if he could.]

The first-order approach to principal-agent problems involves relaxing the constraint that the agent choose an action which is utility maximizing to require instead only that the agent choose an action at which his utility is at a stationary point. Although more mathematically tractable, this approach is generally invalid. This paper identifies sufficient conditions-the monotone likelihood ratio condition and convexity of the distribution function condition-for the first-order approach to be valid. The Pareto-optimal wage contract is shown to be nondecreasing in output under these same conditions. MIRRLEES [5] WAS THE FIRST to point out that the standard method for analyzing the principal-agent problem is not generally correct. This method, the so-called first-order approach, involves weakening the constraint that the agent choose a utility-maximizing action to require instead only that the agent choose an action at which his utility is at a stationary point. The resulting problem is more mathematically tractable. However, as Mirrlees [5] has shown, necessary conditions for a contract to solve the first-order program are not generally even necessary conditions for the valid program. Therefore qualitative propositions about the nature of the Pareto-optimal contract derived from the first-order approach are not in general valid. This has motivated researchers to try to identify classes of cases where the first-order approach is valid.

This paper presents necessary and sufficient conditions for the expected value of consumer surplus to correctly represent a consumer's preferences. A theorem characterizing utility functions which represent preferences over conditional probabilities is used to derive this. An application to price stabilization policy is presented.

It is often argued that the same expenditures on military procurement would produce a more effective defense if larger numbers of less sophisticated (and thus cheaper) weapons were purchased. This paper shows that such a result can occur even if the military derives no private consumption value from technically sophisticated weapons. Rather, the organization of the decision-making process itself can produce this result. This suggests some possible solutions through organizing decision-making in a different fashion.

This paper considers the profit‐maximization problem of a firm that must make sunk investments in long‐lived assets to produce output. It is shown that if per‐period accounting income is calculated using a simple and natural allocation rule for investment, called the relative replacement cost (RRC) rule, under a broad range of plausible circumstances, the firm can choose the fully optimal sequence of investments over time simply by choosing a level of investment each period in order to maximize the next period’s accounting income. Furthermore, in a model in which shareholders delegate the investment decision to a better‐informed manager, it is shown that if accounting income based on the RRC allocation rule is used as a performance measure for the manager, robust incentives are created for the manager to choose the profit‐maximizing sequence of investments, regardless of the manager’s own personal discount rate or other aspects of the manager’s personal preferences.