Knowledge that Transforms

To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
190 results ✕ Clear filters

The effects of budget goals and task interdependence on the level of and variance in performance: a research note

Accounting, Organizations and Society 1999 24(3), 205-216 open access
The effects of goal setting and task interdependence on both the level of and variance in performance are examined using a laboratory, resource allocation task. The results show, consistent with existing research, main effects for goal setting and task interdependence on the level of performance, but no goal setting by task interaction effect as hypothesised. The results also show that an increase in task interdependence increases performance variance but that goal setting reduces it with important implications for budget setting.

The effect of audit seniors’ decisions on working paper documentation and on partners’ decisions

Accounting, Organizations and Society 1999 24(2), 155-171 open access
Prior research reports that the memories of working paper preparers may be biased toward evidence consistent with their prior decisions, but that reviewers exposed to the same set of evidence can mitigate the bias by evaluating inconsistent evidence. This study tests whether audit seniors’ decisions bias their ability to recognize evidence to document in working papers, and whether biased documentation affects the decisions of audit partners who are exposed only to the subset of evidence that seniors recognize and document. Experiment 1 confirms that audit seniors’ prior decisions bias their memories for evidence to document in working papers, and also creates materials for experiment 2. Experiment 2 offers a new insight: when exposed only to the evidence that seniors recognize and document, partners make decisions biased in the direction of the seniors’ decisions, since not all of the inconsistent evidence is documented. Experimental procedures controlled for four alternative interpretations: justification, evidence order, recency, and primacy.

Confidence and the welfare of less-informed investors

Accounting, Organizations and Society 1999 24(8), 623-647 open access
In response to recommendations by the AICPA Special Committee on Financial Reporting and the Association for Investment Management and Research, the FASB recently invited comment regarding the question, “Given [efficient] markets, would any disservice be done to the interests of individual investors by allowing professional investors access to more extensive information?” [AICPA (1996) Report of the Special Committee on Financial Reporting and the Association for Investment Management and Research, New York, p. 22]. Research in psychology [e.g. Griffin & Tversky (1992) The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psychology, 411–435] suggests that less-informed investors may suffer from over-confidence and trade too aggressively given their information. This paper reports on an experiment designed to address these issues. In the experiment, security values are determined by the price/book ratios of actual firms, “more-informed” investors observe three value-relevant financial ratios derived from Value-Line reports, and “less-informed” investors observe only one of those signals. Even after market prices have stabilized after many rounds of trading, less-informed investors systematically transfer wealth to more-informed investors as a result of biased prices and overly aggressive trading. However, alerting less-informed investors to the extent of their informational disadvantage eliminates these welfare losses. The results thus suggest that providing information to only professional investors could harm the welfare of less-informed investors if less-informed investors are not aware of the extent of their informational disadvantage.

The importance of national culture in the design of and preference for management controls for multi-national operations

Accounting, Organizations and Society 1999 24(5-6), 441-461 open access
This study investigates the eAects of national culture on firms’ design of and employees’ preference for management controls. Data for testing two hypotheses are collected from 159 Taiwanese managers working in six each of Japanese-, Taiwanese-, and U.S.-owned, size-matched, computers/electronics firms in Taiwan. Overall, the results are consistent with national culture aAecting these firms’ design of and employees’ preference for seven management controls, though there also are anomalies. These findings are combined with prior research for identifying desirable improvements in research design and method, variable measurement and selection, and, most important, the theoretical foundation for culture-based research on management controls. # 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.