To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
2 results ✕ Clear filters

Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring

American Economic Review 2014 104(8), 2509-2526 open access
This paper documents the pervasiveness of job polarization in 16 Western European countries over the period 1993–2010. It then develops and estimates a framework to explain job polarization using routine-biased technological change and offshoring. This model can explain much of both total job polarization and the split into within-industry and between-industry components.

What Happens to Workers at Firms that Automate?

The Review of Economics and Statistics 2025 107(1), 125-141 open access
We estimate the impact of firm-level automation on individual worker outcomes by combining Dutch microdata with a direct measure of automation expenditures covering all private nonfinancial sector firms. Using a novel difference-in-differences event-study design leveraging lumpy investment, we find that automation increases the probability of incumbent workers separating from their employers. Workers experience a five-year cumulative wage income loss of 9% of one year’s earnings, driven by decreases in days worked. These adverse impacts of automation are larger in smaller firms, and for older and middle-educated workers. By contrast, no such losses are found for firms’ investments in computers.