I. Introduction, 197. — II. Substitutability: theoretical arguments, 198. — III. Empirical tests: general approach, 200. — IV. Conclusions regarding regulations and monetary policy, 213. — Appendix, 213.

Jerome L. Stein, Keizo Nagatani; Stabilization Policies in a Growing Economy1, The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 36, Issue 2, 1 April 1969, Pages 165–

In this paper a family of functional iterations is introduced. One member of this family is the Newton-Raphson method and another member, obtained from a generalization of Steffensen's method to a system of equations, has been considered in [7]. The general member of the family is derived from a regulafalsi construction, due to Gauss, for a particular choice of points in the iteration. From the computational point of view, all the members of the family of iterations, except the Newton-Raphson method, have the property that the partial derivatives of the system of equations are used almost never if a computing device with unlimited precision is utilized. Further, the asymptotic speed of convergence for any member is at least of order two. In view of the difficulties of obtaining the functional form of the second order partials of the likelihood function for general linear and nonlinear simultaneous systems, the method proposed here may be recommended in the computation of full information maximum likelih Dod estimates. Even if the partials of the system of equations are easily calculated, then some member of the family may still lead to convergence if the Newton-Raphson method does not. Practically speaking, the proposed method can be used to determine an approximate solution and this approximate solution will be closer to the solution if the precision of the computations is higher.

Robert H. Strawser, John M. Ivancevich, Herbert L. Lyon, A Note on the Job Satisfaction of Accountants in Large and Small CPA Firms, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 7, No. 2 (Autumn, 1969), pp. 339-345

to the randomness of profits, rather than to errors in the measurements of K, which would imply a negative bias in p', this too could not explain away the observed negative as, since again one would expect bias /3' in this case too, to be less than one in absolute value. Thus, the observed negative cannot be explained as the consequence of using a bad cost of capital variable and therefore can be taken as an indication of greater capital-schooling (skill) complementarity.4