Double-entry bookkeeping, Programming, Accounting

Accounting history, Double-entry Bookkeeping, Inca's

E. P. Howrey, R. E. Quandt; The Dynamics of the Number of Firms in an Industry1, The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 35, Issue 3, 1 July 1968, Pages 349

Our interest in this study is the relative informativeness of earnings announcements reported before and after Form 8-K disclosures of the reason for an auditor change. We appeal to several models that predict that the market's response to an earnings surprise is positively related to the perceived precision of the earnings report. We predict that the Form 8-K reason disclosures aid investors in updating their expectations of earnings precision by providing useful information about the financial reporting process that produces the earnings report. For 802 auditor changes from late 1991 through late 1997, the average price response per unit of earnings surprise is lower subsequent to an auditor change for companies that switched for disagreement-related or fee-related reasons and higher for those that switched for service-related reasons. This paper provides further evidence on the effects of differential earnings quality on differences in the returns-earnings relation across companies and over time as well as the efficacy of Form 8-K disclosures of reasons for auditor changes.

Our interest in this study is the relative informativeness of earnings announcements reported before and after Form 8‐K disclosures of the reason for an auditor change. We appeal to several models that predict that the market's response to an earnings surprise is positively related to the perceived precision of the earnings report. We predict that the Form 8‐K reason disclosures aid investors in updating their expectations of earnings precision by providing useful information about the financial reporting process that produces the earnings report. For 802 auditor changes from late 1991 through late 1997, the average price response per unit of earnings surprise is lower subsequent to an auditor change for companies that switched for disagreement‐related or fee‐related reasons and higher for those that switched for service‐related reasons. This paper provides further evidence on the effects of differential earnings quality on differences in the returns‐earnings relation across companies and over time as well as the efficacy of Form 8‐K disclosures of reasons for auditor changes.

Pre-announcement information is private information gathered in anticipation of a public disclosure. Event-period information is private information useful in conjunction with the announcement itself. Typically rational models of trade are based exclusively on one type of information. Such models are less descriptive of real market settings and misspecified empirically. Therefore, we introduce a model of rational trade with both features and discuss its implications.

The paper analyzes the use of reported accounting earnings and price as a basis for compensating a manager when he trades on private information, and share price is set rationally based on privately held information, publicly available and contractible information, and publicly available but noncontractible information. In addition, we analyze the comparative statics of the compensation on reported earnings and price with respect to changes in the economy.

This paper suggests that earnings announcements provide information that allows certain traders to make judgements about a firm's performance that are superior to the judgements of other traders. As a result, there may be more information asymmetry at the time of an announcement than in nonannouncement periods. More information asymmetry implies that bid–ask spreads increase, suggesting that market liquidity decreases at the time of an earnings announcement. Furthermore, informed opinions resulting from public disclosure may lead to an increase in trading volume, despite the reduction in liquidity that accompanies announcements.

As maintained by J. M. Clark the amplitude of the investment cycle is larger and that of the consumption cycle smaller than that of the income cycle, provided only the consumption constant is larger than zero. On the other hand, it is true that acceleration is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for magnification: not a necessary condition since (4) is independent of the investment function; not a sufficient condition since, for co = o, magnification is absent regardless of the investment function and even if Baumol's equation (3) were valid and his conditions for magnification were satisfied.