Knowledge that Transforms

Stock return over a period reflects the market's revision in expectation of future earnings. Accounting earnings over the same period, however, have limited ability to reflect such revised expectations. Therefore, returns anticipate earnings changes and the earnings response coefficient from a regression of returns on contemporaneous earnings changes is biased toward zero. We reduce this bias by including leading-period returns in price-earnings regressions. The resulting estimated earnings response coefficient magnitudes suggest that the capital market, on average, views earnings changes to be largely permanent. This is consistent with the random walk time series property of annual earnings.

This study separates trading volume into buyer- and seller-initiated activities and examines the directional volume reaction in small and large trades to different types of earnings news. ‘Good’ (‘bad’) news triggers brief, but intense, buying (selling) in the large trades. However, a persistent period of unusually high buying activity is observed in the small trades irrespective of the news. This anomalous proclivity of small traders to buy is robust across firm size, trading volume, and different earnings expectation models. Several explanations are discussed, although the behavior does not seem fully explained by existing theories.

This paper evaluates the relative performance of IBES consensus financial analyst forecasts and forecasts based upon the anticipatory behaviour of security prices, according to two criteria: (a) the accuracy of earnings growth predictions and (b) the contemporaneous association between unexpected earnings and security returns during the forecast year. Results are presented for firms in differing size groups, measured here by market capitalization. The results indicate that neither forecast source is superior to the other in terms of either criterion. There is, however, significant complementarity of financial analyst and price-based forecasts.

We consider a principal-agent model to examine the effectiveness of responsibility centers, in particular cost or profit centers. We show that rather than contracting with each agent directly, the principal can create equally powerful incentives by setting up a responsibility center structure. The principal contracts with only the ‘manager’ of the center and delegates contracting with other agents and coordinating their activities. The principal then must monitor some measure of financial performance such as the center's cost of profit. We also find that responsibility centers dominate direct contracting with the agents when communication is limited.

This study examines the effect of the book income adjustment provision in the 1986 alternative minimum tax (AMT) on financial accounting practices. A model is developed to identify firms that are more susceptible to the book income adjustment. The changes in financial accounting practices for firms affected by the AMT are then examined. Our results indicate that firms that are likely to be affected by the book income adjustment shift timing and permanent differences across years to reduce the impact of the AMT.

This review explores systematic explanations for the anomalous evidence in the relation between accounting earnings and stock prices. The anomaly is that estimated future abnormal returns are predicted by public information about future earnings, contained in (1) current earnings and (2) current financial statement ratios. The current-earnings anomaly appears due to either market inefficiency or substantial costs of investors acquiring and processing information, the choice depending on one's priors concerning these costs and one's definition of market ‘efficiency’. The financial-statement-information anomaly appears due to accounting ratios proxying for stocks' expected returns. Anomaly seems likely to be a permanent state.

This paper posits that stock market response to two accounting performance measures - sales growth and capital investment - is a function of firm life cycle stage. Firms are grouped into various life cycle portfolios using dividend payout, sales growth, and age. As predicted, the empirical results indicate a monotonic decline in the response coefficients of unexpected sales growth and unexpected capital investment from the growth to the stagnant stages. Additional analysis suggests that this relation is not driven by a firm size effect, risk differences, or measurement error in the proxies for performance measures.

The paper analytically evaluates alternative specifications of price-earnings regressions when prices lead earnings, i.e., reflect information about future earnings that is not reflected in the past time series of earnings. Because prices lead earnings, the specification using the earnings-level-deflated-by-price variable in a price-earnings regression is ‘better’, in terms of bias in the estimated earnings response coefficient and explanatory power, than specifications using earnings-change-deflated-by-price and earnings-deflated-by-lagged-earnings variables. An accurate proxy for unexpected earnings, however, outperforms the earnings-level- and earnings-change-deflated-by-price specifications.

The paper analyzes the contemporaneous association between market returns and earnings for long return intervals. The research design exploits two fundamental accounting attributes: (i) earnings aggregate over periods, and (ii) expanding the interval over which earnings are determined, is likely to reduce ‘measurement errors’ in (aggregate) earnings. These concepts lead to the level of (aggregate) earnings as a natural earnings variable for explaining security returns. We hypothesize that the longer the interval over which earnings are aggregated, the higher the cross-sectional correlation between earnings and returns. The empirical findings support this hypothesis.

This study distinguishes between the information in the Ou and Penman (1989a) Pr measure and that in analysts' forecasts of earnings. For cases where analysts' forecasts are available, trading on Pr produces abnormal returns only when the predictions of Pr and those of analysts' forecasts disagree. This is consistent with Pr capturing some information not impounded in market prices. However, abnormal returns to this trading strategy continue for up to 72 months after the release of the data necessary to compute Pr. This is consistent with Pr proxying for the effects of omitted risk factors.