To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
14 results

Classificatory Smoothing of Income with Extraordinary Items.

The Accounting Review 1976 51(1), 110-122
The paper presents tests of whether extraordinary revenues and expenses are used to smooth ordinary or operating income over time. While the subject of income smoothing was discussed and tested previously, the role of extraordinary items never was tested for specifically and separately. This observation is most striking, particularly in view of the fact that by applying different smoothing mechanisms, extraordinary items can be used to smooth various series, such as net, ordinary or operating income. Although past studies assumed that smoothing is practiced in order to affect the income stream presumably utilized by financial statements users, the focus was exclusively on the net income numbers, when, in fact, ordinary income per share is the focal number of users of financial statements and therefore, should be the object of smoothing. Indeed, income smoothing could be designed to convey information relevant for the prediction of future earnings. In the present case, smoothing is used as a vehicle for management to convey its expectations within the framework of conventional accounting practices, which do not permit direct forecasts.

Nature or nurture: What determines investor behavior?☆

Journal of Financial Economics 2010 98(3), 583-604
Using data on identical and fraternal twins’ complete financial portfolios, we decompose the cross-sectional variation in investor behavior. We find that a genetic factor explains about one-third of the variance in stock market participation and asset allocation. Family environment has an effect on the behavior of young individuals, but this effect is not long-lasting and disappears as an individual gains experience. Frequent contact among twins results in similar investment behavior beyond a genetic factor. Twins who grew up in different environments still display similar investment behavior. Our interpretation of a genetic component of the decision to invest in the stock market is that there are innate differences in factors affecting effective stock market participation costs. We attribute the genetic component of asset allocation—the relative amount invested in equities and the portfolio volatility—to genetic variation in risk preferences.