tional attainments suggests the usefulness of special training programs for unskilled immigrants. Further, the persistence of racial differentials underscores the importance of the enforcement of anti-bias employment regulations to protect non-white immigrants. Recent changes in immigration law under the Refugee Act of 1980 will increase uncertainty regarding the composition of future immigration waves. It is likely, however, that the proportion of immigrants for whom specialized training and anti-bias regulation enforcement can hasten the traditional catch-up process which has historically characterized the immigrant economic experience will continually increase. Additional research using more recent data will allow both the efficacy of the recommendations advanced and the persistence of the observed patterns to be tested.

gence on fertility and of household size on offspring's intelligence remain the subject of public debate. Most recently, attention has centered on the decline in Scholastic Aptitude Test scores and the possible effects of the postwar baby boom. These concerns suggest that economists would do well to introduce intelligence into the household utility maximization model used to explain differential fertility. We attempt to do this here.

According to the Easterlin hypothesis, the positive relationship between income and fertility is dependent on relative income. The hypothesis presumes that aspirations are significantly determined by family background. If income is high relative to aspirations, individuals will tend to have more children. The definition of variables as sibling differences controls family background and yields a measure of relative income. Analyzing the Kalamazoo Brothers sample in this fashion produces no evidence in support of the hypothesis.