To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
65 results ✕ Clear filters

Economies of Scale and the Profitability of Marginal-Cost Pricing: Reply

Quarterly Journal of Economics 1979 93(4), 743
Journal Article Economies of Scale and the Profitability of Marginal-Cost Pricing: Reply Get access John C. Panzar, John C. Panzar Bell Laboratories Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Robert D. Willig Robert D. Willig Princeton University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 93, Issue 4, November 1979, Pages 743–744, https://doi.org/10.2307/1884483 Published: 01 November 1979

EQUILIBRIUM AND WELFARE IN UNREGULATED AIRLINE MARKETS

American Economic Review 1979
This paper introduces and analyzes a monopolistically competitive model of airline markets which takes account of the product differentation effect resulting from variation in flight departure times, and the effects of flight frequency and load factor on service quality. The basic results are that (1) when the direct benefits (to consumers) of increasing flight frequency are exhausted, socially optimal choices of price and frequency result in zero profits for the industry, but (2) a noncooperative, free entry equilibrium always results in higher prices, lower load factors, and greater frequency than are socially optimal.

An Analysis of a Macro-Econometric Model with Rational Expectations in the Bond and Stock Markets

American Economic Review 1979 69(4), 539-552
[The primary purpose of this paper is to compare the predictive accuracy of four models: (1) Sargent's classical macroeconometric model, (2) Sim's six-equation unconstrained vector autoregression model, (3) a "naive" eighth-order autoregressive model, and (4) my model. A recent method that I have proposed for estimating the predictive accuracy of a model, which takes account of the four main sources of uncertainty of a forecast, is used for the comparisons. The results indicate that Sargent's and Sims's models are the same as or less accurate than the naive model, depending on the variable, and that my model is more accurate for real GNP, the GNP deflator, and the unemployment rate and less accurate for the money supply and the wage rate than the naive model. A secondary purpose of the paper is to point out some econometric mistakes that Sargent made in his empirical work and to propose an alternative technique that can be used to estimate a rational expectations model like his.]