This study examines empirically the role played by direct disclosure in the valuation of initial public offerings (IPOs). We investigate why some firms making an initial public offering in Canada include an earnings forecast in the offering prospectus and others do not, and, in particular, the role of such direct disclosures in IPO valuation. We explore several hypotheses motivated by the voluntary disclosure and signaling literatures. Our results are consistent with the hypotheses that (1) forecasters have “good news” to reveal about future earnings prospects relative to nonforecasters, (2) the earnings forecast signals are valuation relevant, and (3) the market is able to correct for expected forecast error or bias in the earnings forecast. Résumé. Les auteurs font une analyse empirique du rôle que joue la présentation directe d'information dans l'évaluation des premiers appels publics à lépargne. Ils se penchent sur les raisons pour lesquelles certaines sociétés qui font appel public à l'épargne au Canada intègrent à leur prospectus d'émission des prévisions de bénéfices, alors que d'autres ne le font pas, et ils s'intéressent en particulier au rôle de la présentation directe de ce genre d'information dans l'évaluation d'un premier appel public à l'épargne. Ils examinent plusieurs hypothèses inspirées d'ouvrages traitant de présentation volontaire d'information et d'indicateurs. Les résultats obtenus sont conformes aux hypothèses selon lesquelles 1) ceux qui font état de prévisions ont de l'information positive à communiquer au sujet des perspectives de bénéfices, contrairement à ceux qui ne font état d'aucune prévision, 2) les indicateurs que représentent les prévisions de bénéfices sont pertinents à l'évaluation et 3) le marché a la capacité de corriger l'information qu'il reçoit pour tenir compte des erreurs ou des distorsions anticipées dans les prévisions de bénéfices.

Recent empirical work by Krinsky and Rotenberg (KR) (1989a, b) suggests that the relationship between entrepreneurial ownership retention and initial valuation of unseasoned common shares may not hold in the Canadian environment. In this study, we replicate and extend KR's tests on our more recent Canadian sample of 180 IPOs that listed on the TSE between 1984 and 1987. We find empirical evidence that initial valuation is increasing in the ownership retention signal (α), even when retention is included with various other possible managerial or firm‐specific signals about future cash flows. Further, we find this result to be robust with respect to a number of different model specifications as well as across different definitions of who the entrepreneur is, different classes of common stock, and different types of offering units. Résumé. Les récents travaux empiriques de Krinsky et Rotenberg (1989a, b) donnent à penser que la relation entre la rétention par l'entrepreneur d'une participation dans l'entreprise et l'évaluation initiale d'actions ordinaires émises par une entreprise non solidement établie pourrait ne pas tenir dans le contexte canadien. Dans l'étude qui suit, les auteurs reprennent, en les élargissant, les tests de Krinsky et Rotenberg auprès d'un échantillon canadien plus récent de 180 premiers appels publics à l'épargne sur la bourse de Toronto, entre 1984 et 1987. Ils démontrent empiriquement que l'évaluation initiale des actions émises augmente au signal de rétention d'une participation (α), même lorsque la rétention fait partie de divers signaux possibles relatifs à la direction ou spécifiques à l'entreprise au sujet des flux monétaires éventuels. Les auteurs concluent en outre que la solidité de cette conclusion résiste à la modification des caractéristiques du modèle ainsi qu'à la modification des définitions de l'identité des entrepreneurs, des différentes catêgories d'actions ordinaires et des différents types d'unités émises.

The objective of this study is to examine the market valuation of environmental capital expenditure investment related to pollution abatement in the pulp and paper industry. The total environmental capital expenditure of $8.7 billion by our sample firms during 1989–2000 supports the focus on this industry. In order to be capitalized, an asset should be associated with future economic benefits. The existing environmental literature suggests that investors condition their evaluation of the future economic benefits arising from environmental capital expenditure on an assessment of the firms' environmental performance. This literature predicts the emergence of two environmental stereotypes: low-polluting firms that overcomply with existing environmental regulations, and high-polluting firms that just meet minimal environmental requirements. Our valuation evidence indicates that there are incremental economic benefits associated with environmental capital expenditure investment by low-polluting firms but not high-polluting firms. We also find that investors use environmental performance information to assess unbooked environmental liabilities, which we interpret to represent the future abatement spending obligations of high-polluting firms in the pulp and paper industry. We estimate average unbooked liabilities of $560 million for high-polluting firms, or 16.6 percent of market capitalization.

In this study, we examine how achievement‐related tendencies are expressed in the professional auditing context, particularly through the interplay between the CEO and the audit partner. We use the facial width‐to‐height ratio (fWHR), a stable morphological trait widely applied in prior research, as a proxy for achievement drive. Using a sample of US audit partners from 2016 to 2019, we find that higher achievement drive is associated with enhanced audit quality, evidenced by fewer restatements and lower abnormal accruals. Auditors with higher achievement drive are also more likely to become industry experts, attain leadership positions, and achieve partnership status more quickly. Importantly, we find that high‐achievement‐drive audit partners are more inclined to assert dominance in negotiations, particularly when working with equally driven CEOs, leading to improved audit quality. Overall, our findings suggest that, when activated in auditing contexts, achievement‐oriented tendencies, as proxied by fWHR, are linked to higher audit quality.