Examines a principal-agent model in which the principal can influence the extent to which the agent has superior private information on which the latter can base his action choice. Relevance of information furnished by management accounting systems in the assessment of employees; Conditions for the improvement of the agent's private pre-decision information system.

Management control system, Agency model, Private information

[This paper explores a possible explanation for the observed use of bonus pool arrangements. Under fairly general conditions, the use of a bonus pool arrangement results in a strict Pareto improvement by enabling an owner to exploit non-contractible information, that might otherwise not be used, to motivate agents. We characterize the optimal bonus pool arrangement and analyze the interdependencies which it induces between agents. Our results demonstrate the manner in which the use of non-contractible information via bonus pool schemes distorts the payoffs to agents relative to the case in which the non-contractible information is not used.]

[In the usual agency analysis of moral hazard, the principal is endowed with a production process and must hire an agent to manage it. Output depends on the agent's effort, the production process supplied by the principal, and some random state realization. A common assumption is that the output of the production process is costlessly observable and sufficiently informative about the agent's effort to warrant using it for contracting. However, this assumption may not be descriptive of a large number of settings. In fact, it is hard to conceive of many production settings in which the gathering and reporting of any information is totally free and independent of costly design decisions. For example, if the agent produces some product, it is not costless to monitor the number or the quality of the units produced; someone must be paid or a machine must be purchased to do so. In addition, some opportunity cost may have to be incurred to rearrange the production process to facilitate the assessment of the agent's work. In this article, we consider the implications of relaxing the assumption that output is costlessly observable and contractible, by analyzing the optimal design of a costly unconditional monitoring system. We characterize the monitoring system in terms of the Type I error associated with the obedient action and the Type II errors associated with the disobedient actions. We find that it is always optimal to design the monitoring system such that the Type I error is smaller than the Type II error for any disobedient action. Further, we find that as the costliness of the monitoring system increases, the Type I error increases monotonically, while the Type II error initially decreases and then increases.]

In this paper we study a two‐person firm consisting of a principal and an agent. The principal hires the agent to provide some input into the production process. The output of the production process is determined by the agent's input and an exogenous state realization. Subsequent to joining the firm, but prior to choosing his input, the agent privately observes the state realization. The principal employs an imperfect monitoring system that publicly reports on the state realization. Our purpose in studying this model is to better understand the effects of monitoring on the design of the optimal employment contract and the determinants of the value of monitoring in a model with asymmetric information. Résumé. Les auteurs étudient une entreprise constituée de deux personnes, un mandant et un mandataire. Le mandant embauche le mandataire pour sa contribution au processus de fabrication. Le résultat du processus de fabrication est déterminé par la contribution du mandataire et par la réalisation d'un état exogène. Après s'être joint à l'entreprise, mais avant de déterminer quelle sera sa contribution, le mandataire observe, en privé, la réalisation de cet état exogène. Le mandant a recours à un système de suivi imparfait qui fait le point, à l'intention du public, sur la réalisation de l'état en question. L'étude de ce modèle permet une meilleure compréhension des conséquences du suivi sur la nature de contrat d'emploi optimal et des déterminants de la valeur du suivi dans un modèle caractérisé par une information asymétrique.

Auditing, Contracting, Principle-agent model, Moral hazard

An important characteristic of any buyer‐supplier relationship is the amount and type of information that is exchanged between the contracting parties. Buyer‐supplier networks are characterized by greater information exchange than arm’s‐length transactions. This enhanced information exchange allows for greater production efficiency but increases the potential for information misappropriation. In this paper we characterize the set of innovations for which each of these forms of exchange relationships is efficient. We then explore the effect of an initial information linkage between the buyer and supplier. Such linkages increase the set of innovations for which networks are efficient. However, such linkages have a negative effect on the buyer’s incentive to innovate and an ambiguous effect on the supplier’s incentive to invest in flexible production techniques. Finally, we identify settings in which the buyer‐supplier surplus is greater with such linkages.

Capital investment decisions, Centralized organization, Delegation, Shared responsibility