Knowledge that Transforms

To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
2204 results ✕ Clear filters

JPE Turnaround Times, Previous Two Years

Journal of Political Economy 2022 130(3), 823-823
Previous articleNext article FreeJPE Turnaround Times, Previous Two YearsPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreJPE Turnaround Times, Previous Two Years Outcome of 1st Round DecisionsMean Days to DecisionMedian Days to DecisionDecision Later than Six Months after Submission (as percentage of decisions within decision type)Desk Rejection51%870%Reject with Reviews40%12210315%Revise9%20118551%Average time from original submission to acceptance (omitting time with author in revision) = 471 days View Table Image Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 130, Number 3March 2022 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/719054 Views: 1198 © 2022 The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

Recent Referees

Journal of Political Economy 2022 130(3)
Previous articleNext article FreeRecent RefereesPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreThe Journal of Political Economy acknowledges the assistance of:Amanda AganFrancesco AgostinelliSule AlanChris AndersonDan AndrewsCristina ArellanoIrani ArráizDavid AutorEduardo AzevedoRüdiger BachmannWarren BaileyAllen BergerDavid BergerMarianne BertrandBarbara BiasiAdrien BilalMark BilsCarola BinderDan BlackPedro BordaloAntoine BouveretAlec BrandonMary Ann BronsonSteven CallanderColin CamererGregory ClarkJeffrey ClemensJohn CochranePierre-Philippe CombesNatalie CoxThomas DavidoffMark DeanSalva DemiralpTommaso DentiJonathan DingelThomas DohmenAxel DreherMikhail DrugovJanice EberlyRuben EnikolopovEugene FamaJonathan FeinsteinJeremy FoxMarco FrancesconiGuillaume FrechetteDavid FreemanEric FrenchJana GallusAndrew GarinNicolae GarleanuJohn GeanakoplosDouglas GollinBenjamin GolubQing GongYuriy GorodnichenkoKareem HaggagZhiguo HeBernard HerskovicAnnette HofmannDavid HowardEnrique IdeEthan IlzetzkiB. Kelsey JackMatthew JaremskiRobert JensenRuixue JiaMatthew JohnsonYuichiro KamadaLoukas KarabarbounisWilliam KerrMorris KleinerScott KominersLuc LaevenRicardo LagosRasmus LandersøLungFei LeeThomas LemieuxSimone LenzuKenneth LeonardJustin LeungJean-Paul L’HuillierIlse LindenlaubKjell LommerudCorinne LowLeonardo MartinezCostas MeghirGuido MenzioJoel MokyrTimothy MooreMichael Mueller-SmithCasey MulliganSalvador NavarroTom NicholasAnant NyshadhamAli OzdagliIgnacio Palacios-HuertaRicardo Perez-TrugliaRoberto PerottiIvan PetrellaVincenzo PezoneMikkel Plagborg-MøllerMichael PowellCanice PrendergastIgnacio PresnoNatalia RamondoDoron RavidDaniel ReckAna ReynosoAlbrecht RitschlGuillaume RocheteauJean-Laurent RosenthalSutanuka RoyJohn RustStephen RyanMaryam SaeediAlbert SaizYuval SalantAnya SamekJustin SandefurManuel SantosPierre-Daniel SarteLawrence SchmidtPhilipp SchnablBradley SetzlerLin ShenRodrigo SoaresJoel SobelXi SongPeter SørensenCharles SprengerUwe SundeRichard SweeneyBalázs SzentesRobert TopelAlexander TorgovitskyRobert TownsendEgon TripodiBertil TungoddenMartín UribeAna VasiljPietro VeronesiMartin WeidnerPierre-Olivier WeillEyal WinterAlexander WolitzkyArlene WongGeorge WuMo XiaoChen YehJohn YingerYves ZenouSeth ZimmermanGabriel Zucman Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 130, Number 3March 2022 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/719563 Views: 1019 © 2022 The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

JPE Turnaround Times, Previous Two Years

Journal of Political Economy 2022 130(2), 521-521
Previous articleNext article FreeJPE Turnaround Times, Previous Two YearsPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreJPE Turnaround Times, Previous Two Years Outcome of 1st Round DecisionsMean Days to DecisionMedian Days to DecisionDecision Later than Six Months after Submission (as percentage of decisions within decision type)Desk Rejection53%970%Reject with Reviews39%12110515%Revise8%19417147%Average time from original submission to acceptance (omitting time with author in revision) = 443 days View Table Image Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 130, Number 2February 2022 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/718791 Views: 1224 © 2021 The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

Recent Referees

Journal of Political Economy 2022 130(2)
Previous articleNext article FreeRecent RefereesPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreJournal of Political Economy acknowledges the assistance of:Manuel AdelinoJonathan AlevyOmar Al-UbaydliLuis AraujoScott AshworthMarco BattagliniNathaniel Baum-SnowMartin BerajaChristopher BerryJohn BeshearsAyan BhattacharyaAdrien BilalChristopher BlattmanLarry BlumeStéphane BonhommeTimo BoppartEric BudishLorenzo CaliendoCaterina CalsamigliaFilipe CampanteSarah CattanGabe Chodorow-ReichStephen CoateZoë CullenPatricio DaltonThomas DavidoffEduardo DavilaDavid de la CroixDouglas DiamondJulian di GiovanniJonathan DingelUmut DurChristian DustmannTore EllingsenRicardo EstradaFederico EtroArmin FalkErnst FehrIván Fernández-ValRam FishmanChristopher FlinnAnthony FowlerAlexander FrankelJoachim FreybergerXavier GabaixDouglas GalePeter GanongPieter GautierAnne GielenAndy GloverBart GolsteynArpit GuptaJonathan GuryanValentin HaddadGeorge HallNikolaj HarmonJonathan HeathcoteBenjamin HébertOri HeffetzDaniel HerbstBerthold HerrendorfMitchell HoffmanDaniel HungermanYuhta IshiiPamela JakielaLisa KahnAmir KermaniJun Hyung KimNobuhiro KiyotakiRalph KoijenFuhito KojimaAnton KorinekStefan KrasaArvind KrishnamurthyKory KroftJulien LabonneDavid LagakosEdwin LaiNathaniel LaneJean-François LaslierAndrei LevchenkoJonathan LibgoberAndrea LinarelloIlse LindenlaubMichael LipsitzAriel ListoErnest LiuGiovanni MaggiIsabela ManeliciZacharias ManiadisIsaac MbitiDavid McKenzieStephan MeierMarti MestieriRobert MoffittCorina MommaertsAlexander Monge-NaranjoIsmael MourifiéDmitry MukhinGisle NatvikDavid NeumarkWhitney NeweySam NorrisLee OhanianAtsushi OhyamaSantiago OliverosRalph OssaNicholas PapageorgeFernando ParroLuboš PástorPetra PerssonTommaso PorzioFabien Postel-VinayDavid PowellGautam RaoPhilip RenySteven RivkinRoberto RobattoEvan RoseMark RosenzweigEvan SadlerSally SadoffBernard SalaniéJames SalleeAnya SamekJuan SánchezPeter SavelyevEdouard SchaalFabiano SchivardiChristoph SchlomMolly SchnellAmit SeruFelipe SeverinoYotam Shem-TovRan ShorrerRon SiegelJirka SlacalekLones SmithXi SongKonstantin SoninSebastian SoteloRobert StaigerColin StewartJohannes StroebelDavid StrömbergGuido TabelliniMichele TertiltDuncan ThomasRobert TopelAlexander TorgovitskyGaute TorsvikFabrice TourreMathias TrabandtAntonella TrigariFabio TufanoBertil TungoddenChristine ValenteMichelangelo VastaDimitri VayanosChristian vom LehnJessica WachterChristopher WaltersMark WatsonHongcen WeiDaniel WilhelmMatthew WiswallNikolaus WolfMichael WoodfordRandall WrightDaniel Yi XuJunsen Zhang Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 130, Number 2February 2022 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/719114 Views: 1008 © 2022 The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

JPE Turnaround Times, Previous Two Years

Journal of Political Economy 2022 130(1), 258-258
Previous articleNext article FreeJPE Turnaround Times, Previous Two YearsPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreJPE Turnaround Times, Previous Two Years Outcome of 1st Round DecisionsMean Days to DecisionMedian Days to DecisionDecision Later than Six Months after Submission (as percentage of decisions within decision type)Desk Rejection53%970%Reject with Reviews39%12110515%Revise8%19417147%Average time from original submission to acceptance (omitting time with author in revision) = 443 days View Table Image Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 130, Number 1January 2022 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/718311 Views: 613 © 2021 The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

Recent Referees

Journal of Political Economy 2022 130(1)
Previous articleNext article FreeRecent RefereesPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreJournal of Political Economy acknowledges the assistance of:Treb AllenManuel AmadorSandro AmbuehlOrazio AttanasioBjoern BartlingDaniel BenjaminMarianne BertrandManudeep BhullerNick BloomTimo BoppartGeorge BorjasJaroslav BorovičkaSamuel BowlesSerguey BraguinskyYves BreitmoserBenjamin BrooksBrent BundickLeonardo BursztynJulia Cajal GrossiAndrew CaplinGabriel CarrollGary CharnessDaniel ChenGabe Chodorow-ReichTimothy ChristensenSteve CicalaThomas ColemanDaniele CondorelliDavid CutlerJakša CvitanićGordon DahlBrendan DaleyMark DeanMariacristina De NardiKlaus DesmetGustavo de SouzaIan Dew-BeckerJulian di GiovanniThomas DohmenLaura DovalJoseph DoyleOrla DoyleWenxin DuGreg DuncanMaya EdenMark EganHanming FangAnthony FowlerMarco FrancesconiAdriane FreshFrançois GerardDino GerardiDonna GilleskieGautam GowrisankaranSanjeev GoyalJoshua Graff ZivinGabriele GrattonMatthew GrennanPaul GriecoPhilip Grossmanİrem GüçeriAdam GurenNima HaghpanahJames HamiltonGordon HansonJuan Carlos HatchondoBenjamin HébertPablo Hernández-LagosJohn HoddinottMitchell HoffmanMartin HolmJustin HolzJean-François HoudeKilian HuberJohn Eric HumphriesFederico HuneeusRuixue JiaJuanna JoensenKyle JuradoAriel KalilGanesh KarapakulaMaximilian KasyMatthias KehrigJun Hyung KimGeorg KirchsteigerAyhan KoseFabian KosseAndreas Ravndal KostølAart KraayLuc LaevenMiguel Leon-LedesmaArthur LewbelNuno LimãoJay LuHanno LustigGuangrong MaGlenn MagermanLuca MainiWilliam MaloneyFrançois ManiquetChiara MargariaArnaud MaurelSandra MaximianoBhashkar MazumderMichael McMahonJoseph McMurrayLukas MenkhoffKonrad MenzelBruce MeyerGuy MichaelsRobert MoffittSimon MongeyDonald MorganAmeet MorjariaJack MountjoyAndreas MoxnesPaulo NatenzonMatthew NeidellNick NetzerKieu-Trang NguyenPascal NoelDavid NovgorodskyMarco OttavianiDimitris PapanikolaouFernando ParroDavid PearceHarry PeiCarolin PfluegerPaolo PinottiSuphanit PiyapromdeeMattias PolbornMarek PyciaValerie RameyLina RamirezMar ReguantPhilip RenyAna ReynosoJames RobinsonDaniel RoggerJesse RothsteinSébastien RouxAldo RustichiniVjollca SadirajEmmanuel SaezBernard SalaniéKjell SalvanesLawrence SchmidtPeter SchwardmannJesse ShapiroYongseok ShinDenis ShishkinDan SilvermanAlp SimsekMara SquicciariniMelvin StephensPetra ThiemannFelix TintelnotAlexander TorgovitskyChristopher UdryAlexander WagnerEbonya WashingtonMark WatsonAndrea WeberRoberto WeberChristian WolfAlexander WolitzkyKai Hao YangShengxing ZhangJidong ZhouJin ZhouUlf ZoölitzEric Zwick Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 130, Number 1January 2022 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/718793 Views: 448 © 2022 The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

Prognostic Accuracy of Presepsis and Intrasepsis Characteristics for Prediction of Cardiovascular Events After a Sepsis Hospitalization

Journal of Political Economy 2022 4(4), e0674
Across two large healthcare systems, intrasepsis factors improved postsepsis cardiovascular risk prediction as compared with presepsis cardiovascular risk profiles. Further exploration of sepsis factors that contribute to postsepsis cardiovascular events is warranted for improved mechanistic and predictive models.

Do sin tax hikes spur cheating in interpersonal exchange?

Accounting, Organizations and Society 2022 96, 101281 open access
We study the New York City taxi market to examine whether an excise tax hike on cigarettes corresponds to smoker taxi drivers more frequently cheating their customers. Increased cheating could be motivated by both financial pressures and as a reaction to unfair treatment (as surveyed smokers view cigarette tax hikes as quite unfair). We examine this question using detailed ride-level data where we can identify a rare but fraudulent overcharging technique (cheating) and a subsample of taxi drivers who smoke (affected taxpayers, identified via tickets for smoking in a cab). In difference-in-differences regressions we find that following a cigarette tax hike, taxi drivers who smoke are approximately 1.5 times more likely to cheat customers than other drivers. Our findings are strongest in the subsample of smokers with consistently low earnings.

How do cultural difference, cultural exposure, and CQ affect interpretations of trust from contract choices? Evidence from dyadic cross-country experiments

Accounting, Organizations and Society 2022 96, 101282
Global practices such as offshoring and expatriation of employees increase cross-cultural interactions within and across firms. In this paper, we use three experiments to investigate the effects of cultural differences on employees' interpretations of employers' contract choices. Applying insights from attribution theory, we predict that cultural differences will reduce the likelihood for employees to attribute employers' choice of a more-trusting contract to trust. This in turn will reduce the ability of such contracts to motivate higher employee effort. However, we also suggest that three interventions will mitigate the negative effect of cultural differences: employees' prior and primed exposure to employers' culture and employees' interactional cultural intelligence. In our labor market setting, employers chose a hiring contract for employees who, in return, indicated their effort levels. In all experiments, dyads interacted in real-time either in the same country or across two countries with high cultural difference. Consistent with our predictions, we find that the effectiveness of a bonus contract in increasing employees' effort is reduced by high cultural difference (in experiment 1). We also find that employees' exposure to employers' culture, either due to prior exposure (in experiment 2) or by priming exposure through culture-specific training (in experiment 3) has a mitigating effect. Finally, we find partial support that employees’ interactional cultural intelligence (CQ) has a mitigating effect. Implications to theory and practice are discussed.