To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
27 results

Free Markets, Finance, Ethics, and Law.

Journal of Finance 1994 49(5), 1921
1. A Framework for Ethical Decision Making. 2. Diagnosing and Treating Market Inadequacies. 3. The Legal System, Product Liability and the Creative Use of Bankruptcy. 4. Environmental Issues and the Law of Damages. 5. Fraud, Legal and Financial Agency, Ethics and the Fiduciary Relationship. 6. Regulation: With an Emphasis on Financial Markets. 7. Regulating Financial Markets: Commercial Banking. 8. Regulating Financial Markets: Investment Banking, Securities Markets and Money Management. 9. Corporate Power and Social Responsibility and the Issue of Antitrust. Index.

Errors in estimating share repurchases

Journal of Corporate Finance 2008 14(4), 460-474
We examine the accuracy of various estimates of firms' repurchases of common stock used in earlier studies, and find high error rates in the most commonly used estimators. We also find that the procedure used to estimate open market share repurchases can significantly impact results. The Compustat-based measure, which is the most accurate, deviates from the actual number of shares repurchased by more than 30% in about 16% of the cases. We conclude that many studies should be revisited now that the SEC mandates disclosure of precise information about share repurchases in Forms 10-Q and 10-K.

Risk, illiquidity or marketability: What matters for the discounts on private equity placements?

Journal of Banking & Finance 2015 57, 41-50 open access
Using a clean sample of private equity placements over the period of 1999 to 2012, we examine the determinants of the discounts on private placements. Classifying various determinants into three categories, namely risk, illiquidity, and marketability, we show that risk and marketability are significant determinants of the discount on private placements over the entire sample period. However, we identify a structural break in the relation between the discount on private placements with illiquidity and, to a lesser degree, marketability. Specifically, we find that liquidity is a more important determinant during the pre-2003 period, but marketability becomes a more important determinant during the post-2003 period. We attribute the structural break to substantial changes in market microstructure during our sample period. Lower transaction costs make illiquidity less of a concern for investors, whereas more active trading by investors calls for a higher discount for the lack of marketability.