Stock splits should have no effect on firm value in perfect capital markets, yet stock prices increase on split announcements. The two traditional explanations are information signaling and improved liquidity for shares that trade at lower prices. We investigate these explanations by studying splits of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) that are not associated with splits in their home-country stock, and which represent unique illustrations of the effect of liquidity. We interpret our findings as supportive of the liquidity explanation of stock split announcement effects.

Execution costs, as measured by the quoted spread, the effective spread (which accounts for trades inside the quotes), the realized spread (which measures revenues of suppliers of immediacy), the Roll (1984) implied spread, and the post-trade variability, are twice as large for a sample of NASDAQ stocks as they are for a matched sample of NYSE stocks. The difference is not due to differences in adverse information, in market depth, or in the frequency of even-eighth quotes. Partial explanations are provided by differences in the treatment of limit orders and commissions in the two markets. We conclude that important explanations are the internalization and preferencing of order flow and the presence of alternative interdealer trading systems, factors that limit dealers' incentives to narrow spreads on NASDAQ.

[We show how the efficiency of reorganization is affected by the distribution of control rights under the U.K. insolvency code. Control rights raise particular problems when creditors have different incentives to keep the firm as a going concern. Such differences may arise from the possession of private benefits by particular creditors which are lost if the debtor firm is liquidated. The incidence of inefficient liquidations is influenced by the size and seniority of creditors' claims. The current U.K. code is widely thought to give rise to inefficient liquidations. We show, however, that inefficiency depends upon the debt structure and whether the controlling creditor in formal bankruptcy has private benefits.]

In this paper we outline three ways that experimental methods can add value to academic accounting research, practice, and particularly standard setters such as the Accounting Standards Board (AcSB), the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), and the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC). Through examples, we illustrate that, compared to archival methods, experimental methods can have three advantages in supplying evidence on questions that are important and relevant to financial accounting prescriptions. These advantages are timeliness, inclusiveness, and causality. First, experimental methods can be more timely in that experiments can be designed to provide evidence on an ex ante basis. This advantage particularly applies when there are no relevant archival data available and/or no close historical substitutes for a proposed accounting standard. Second, experiments can be more inclusive. They can test a spectrum of standard‐setting solutions that the archival approach precludes for lack of available data. Finally, experimental methods can powerfully isolate and measure the direction and strength of cause‐effect relations. In their decision making, standard setters require knowledge on the nature and cause of intended and unintended consequences of proposed and already promulgated standards. Therefore, cause‐effect evidence is a critical and valuable input to their deliberations. Résumé. Les auteurs décrivent trois façons d'augmenter, grâce aux méthodes expérimentales, la qualité de la recherche universitaire en comptabilité, de l'exercice de la profession comptable et, en particulier, du travail de normalisation comptable auquel se livrent des organismes comme l'Accounting Standards Board (AcSB), le Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) et l'International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC). Par des exemples, les auteurs illustrent le fait que les méthodes expérimentales peuvent présenter trois avantages, par rapport aux méthodes d'archivage, dans la documentation des questions d'importance pertinentes aux normes de comptabilité financière: la rapidité, l'intégralité et la causalité. En effet, les méthodes expérimentales peuvent être, en premier lieu, plus rapides, du fait qu'il est possible de concevoir les expériences de manière à obtenir des preuves documentaires sur une base ex ante. Cet avantage se concrétise particulièrement lorsqu'il n'existe pas de données d'archives pertinentes disponibles et (ou) aucun proche substitut de données historiques relativement à une norme comptable proposée. En deuxième lieu, les méthodes expérimentales peuvent être plus englobantes. Elles permettent parfois de vérifier un éventail de solutions, en ce qui a trait aux normes, que la méthode des données d'archives ne permet pas de vérifier en raison de l'insuffisance des données disponibles. En dernier lieu, les méthodes expérimentales permettent d'isoler et de mesurer clairement l'orientation et l'intensité des relations de cause à effet. Dans leurs décisions, les responsables de la normalisation doivent disposer de renseignements sur la nature et la cause des conséquences prévues et imprévues des normes proposées et déjà promulguées. C'est pourquoi la documentation relative à la causalité est d'un apport déterminant et précieux dans leurs délibérations.

Consumption data generally indicates that consumption risk is not perfectly diversified across individuals. This paper considers if and when imperfect diversification is a feature of efficient allocations in a symmetric information environment without commitment. It shows that if individuals are sufficiently patient, imperfect diversification is always sub-optimal in the long run; however, if individuals are not so patient, imperfect diversification is always optimal. The paper goes on to demonstrate that the way that history matters in an efficient allocation in a symmetric-information/no-commitment environment can be used to distinguish lack of commitment from other possible rationalizations of imperfect risk sharing, such as efficiency in the presence of asymmetric information.

Loss contingencies, Expectation gap, Auditor judgment, Preresolution information

Do taxes affect corporate debt policy? This paper tests whether the incremental use of debt is positively related to simulated firm-specific marginal tax rates that account for net operating losses, investment tax credits, and the alternative minimum tax. The simulated marginal tax rates exhibit substantial variation due to the dynamics of the tax code, tax regime shifts, business cycle effects, and the progressive nature of the statutory tax schedule. Using annual data from more than 10,000 firms for the years 1980–1992, I provide evidence which indicates that high-tax-rate firms issue more debt than their low-tax-rate counterparts.

[This paper models the effect of information on security prices when there is uncertainty regarding the precision of information. When uncertainty regarding precision is allowed, price response to information is neither linear nor even necessarily monotonic, because the market revises its expectation regarding the precision based on the signal realization. When the underlying information structure is conditionally multivariate normal, the price response (return) is nonlinear with the average response (response per unit of surprise) declining in the absolute magnitude of surprise. This nonlinearity occurs because the market associates lower precision with extreme news. When the precision is distributed in the form of a gamma, the returns function is unimodal in each quadrant ("S-shaped") and negatively sloped at the extremes. The extent of nonlinearity increases in the ex ante uncertainty regarding both the asset value and the precision of information.]

Studies the extent to which corporate information senders develop reputations for truthful reporting. Reputation formation; Incentives for voluntary dissemination of information; Buyers' forecasting and bidding strategies.

[This paper presents the results of an experiment designed to investigate the extent to which information senders develop reputations for truthful reporting. The results indicate that senders were more likely to report truthfully when their misrepresentations imposed costs on the receivers of their reports. With repeated interactions, receivers of the reports were able to discern the sender's reporting strategies, but provided no economic reward for truthfulness.]