Reviews the book "A Practical Manual on the Appraisal of Capital Expenditure," vol. 1, by C.G. Edge.

Reviews the book "On the Accuracy of Economic Observations," 2nd ed., by Oskar Morgenstern.

Accountant and economist are a sensible combination on matters of income determination, as Professors Robert L. Dickens and John O. Blackburn demonstrated, that their several-pronged analysis demolishes the case for replacement cost as an ingredient in accounting net income is, however, deserving of a demurrer. This present article is a criticism of their criticism, the purpose being to return the argument to what the economists regard as its proper grounds. The criticisms embrace three areas, methodology, economic theory, and accounting theory. The methodological criticisms are, of course, general and independent of the subject matter treated. The criticisms on economic theory refer primarily to economic concepts which underlie many of the questions discussed by Dickens and Blackburn and are, of course, specific to economic theory and its applications. The criticisms on accounting theory are principally concerned with the charges, both express and implied, by Dickens and Blackburn that the use of replacement cost is incompatible with the informational needs of stockholders, and significantly less conventional than the use of conventional accounting, thus being an invitation to easy manipulation of accounting data by managers.

This article explores the business entity concept of the 1964 Concepts and Standards Research Committee of the American Accounting Association and its significance to accounting. The committee's study of the business entity concept has caused it to depart significantly from the concise statement of the concept contained in the 1957 Revision. The committee believes that in referring to concepts underlying the conventions of accounting the use of the term business is inappropriately restrictive. The committee suggests that, in accounting, the term entity concept be used. In accounting the entity with which one is concerned may be defined as an area of economic interest to a particular individual or group. The boundaries of such an economic entity are identifiable by determining the interested individual or group, and by determining the nature of that individual's or that group's interest. An economic entity encompasses the activities, events, and utilization of resources that affect the interest of the individual or group. Simply stated, the committee advocates a user-oriented approach in defining an entity. That is, accounting reports about entities are developed to meet the needs of particular individuals or groups.