To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
306 results ✕ Clear filters

II. Mr. Lerner's Supplementary Limits for Price Index Numbers

Review of Economic Studies 1936 3(2), 155
Journal Article Further Notes on Index Numbers: II. Mr. Lerner's Supplementary Limits for Price Index Numbers Get access M. F. W. Joseph M. F. W. Joseph Geneva Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 3, Issue 2, February 1936, Pages 155–157, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967511 Published: 01 February 1936

A Note on Socialist Economics

Review of Economic Studies 1936 4(1), 72
Journal Article A Note on Socialist Economics Get access A. P. Lerner A. P. Lerner London School of Economics Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 4, Issue 1, October 1936, Pages 72–76, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967661 Published: 01 October 1936

Commodity Stocks and Equilibrium

Review of Economic Studies 1936 3(3), 230
Journal Article Commodity Stocks and Equilibrium Get access L. M. Lachmann L. M. Lachmann London Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 3, Issue 3, June 1936, Pages 230–234, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967631 Published: 01 June 1936

Books and Monographs Received

Review of Economic Studies 1936 3(3), 235-235
Journal Article Books and Monographs Received Get access The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 3, Issue 3, June 1936, Page 235, https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/3.3.235 Published: 01 June 1936

The German Bank Act of 1934: A Correction

Review of Economic Studies 1936 3(2), 139
I should like to correct an error which slipped into my article, “The German Bank Act of 1934,” in Vol. II, No. 3, of this Review, p. 217. The phrase, “This ratio also implies a limit, but in contrast to the cash ratio, it is a maximum limit” should read: “This ratio is imposed by the law as a minimum, as in the case of the cash ratio; but in reality it will figure as a maximum as long as the cash ratio is. far from being reached, and the assets forming this second line of defence will be the only means to fill up the first.” The remainder of the paragraph shows the reasons for this assumption.

I

Review of Economic Studies 1936 3(2), 153
Journal Article Further Notes on Index Numbers: I Get access H. Staehle H. Staehle Geneva Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 3, Issue 2, February 1936, Pages 153–155, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967510 Published: 01 February 1936

I. Note on Dr. Machlup's Article

Review of Economic Studies 1936 3(2), 147
Journal Article Further Notes on Elasticity of Substitution: I. Note on Dr. Machlup's Article Get access Milton Friedman Milton Friedman Chicago Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 3, Issue 2, February 1936, Pages 147–148, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967506 Published: 01 February 1936

Unemployment, Basic and Monetary: The Classical Analysis and the Keynesian

Review of Economic Studies 1936 3(3), 201
Journal Article Unemployment, Basic and Monetary: the Classical Analysis and the Keynesian Get access D. G. Champernowne D. G. Champernowne Cambridge Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 3, Issue 3, June 1936, Pages 201–216, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967628 Published: 01 June 1936

Banking Policy and the Exchanges

Review of Economic Studies 1936 3(3), 226
Journal Article Banking Policy and the Exchanges Get access Joan Robinson Joan Robinson Cambridge Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 3, Issue 3, June 1936, Pages 226–229, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967630 Published: 01 June 1936