This paper is the first comprehensive study of price differences for dual class equity at the Oslo Stock Exchange. It analyzes the relative importance of corporate control, foreign ownership restrictions and stock market liquidity for the price differences. The Norwegian market has the peculiar feature that in part of the sample period non-voting shares were trading at a premium to voting shares, i.e., what is usually termed the “voting premium” was negative. This result can be rationalized by restrictions on foreign ownership. In the later part of the period, with no regulatory restrictions on foreign ownership, the voting premium is positive, and related to corporate governance and liquidity.

In the recent financial crisis we saw liquidity in the stock market drying up as a precursor to the crisis in the real economy. We show that such effects are not new; in fact, we find a strong relation between stock market liquidity and the business cycle. We also show that investors' portfolio compositions change with the business cycle and that investor participation is related to market liquidity. This suggests that systematic liquidity variation is related to a “flight to quality” during economic downturns. Overall, our results provide a new explanation for the observed commonality in liquidity.

The market reaction to nonroutine trades by executives and directors is conventionally viewed as increasing in the market’s assessment of insider informativeness about firm value. Using the market reaction as our instrument, we test the proposition that female directors appointed after Norway’s pioneering board gender-balancing quota law exhibit a degree of informativeness similar to that of male directors. Consistent with this proposition, we first show that the average market reaction to female director purchases jumps from a prequota value of zero to a level similar to that of male directors. Second, the market reaction is increasing in the board’s director network connectivity (but not in director busyness). Third, regardless of gender, the positive post-quota market reaction to insider purchases does not translate into holding-period adjusted abnormal performance. Fourth, insider purchase activity by both male and female directors increases significantly during the year following the 2008 financial crisis (when boards were already gender-balanced). This gender-neutral increase in insider purchases caused by the exogenous market-wide stock price drop further suggests that female directors are as informed as their male counterparts about firm value.

We explore the effects of a “tick size war” in which European trading venues directly competed on the minimum pricing increment in the limit order book, the tick size. We find that venues that reduced their tick size immediately captured market shares of both quoted and executed volume from the exchanges that kept their ticks large. We find that tick size competition improves market quality, reducing trading costs, and increasing market-wide depth and volume. These market quality improvements are strongest in stocks where the bid–ask spread was constrained to one tick, where liquidity providers use the finer pricing grid to engage in price competition.