I test whether retirement plan providers extend preferential corporate loan terms to firms that have an overlapping retirement plan relationship. I find that loans from affiliated retirement plan providers (i.e., relationship loans) have lower spreads than non-relationship loans. Relationship loans are also larger and exhibit longer maturities. These terms benefit shareholders without sacrificing the quality of retirement plans available to employees. The favorable terms within this banking relationship are most likely explained by the ability of retirement plan relationships to alleviate information asymmetries in the corporate loan market rather than a quid pro quo arrangement.

We examine the economics that underlie retail trading costs around discount brokers’ widespread adoption of zero commission trading in October 2019. Our analysis of participating brokers’ Rule 606 filings and financial statements reveals little change in payment for order flow, which suggests brokers absorbed the cost of eliminating commissions in a competitive environment. We then perform a difference-in-differences analysis of effective spreads and report economically trivial changes in retail execution costs around the commission change. Finally, we assess the total trading costs of an aggregate retail portfolio compared to a host of counterfactuals. We find that following the zero-commission change, total retail transaction costs dropped substantially even under the extreme counterfactual that these traders pay exchange quoted spreads and receive zero price improvement. Our findings support the brokerage industry's claim that dropping commissions helped retail investors and should ease regulators’ concerns to the contrary.