I. Introduction, 697. — II. To cheat or not to cheat, 698. — III. The inhibited supply curve, 701. — IV. Conclusion, 702.

Dennis W. Draper, James W. Hoag, Financial Intermediation and the Theory of Agency, The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 13, No. 4, Proceedings of Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Western Finance Association, June 20-26, 1978 (Nov., 1978), pp. 595-611

This study presents theory and some exploratory empirical work on several separate strands of monetarism in an international context and reports the results of tests of the two interrelated hypotheses: (a) the United States' monetary expansion was responsible forthe exportation of inflation to the rest of the world during the period of generally fixed exchange rates that lasted from the end of World War II until August 1971 (followed by the Smithsonian revaluations and generalized floating in March 1973), and (b) foreign nations could not control their money supplies, even in the short run, to prevent importing inflation. Succinctly stated, the monetarist approach to macroeconomic phenomena holds that money is preeminent in determining the short-run shocks to real output and the long-run price level of an economy. However, received theory is simply not clear as to whose money is most important in an international context. Is it the domestic money stock which is kept relativelyindependent of foreign forces under fixed exchange rates through astute central bank policy, at least in the short run? Is it the rest of the world money stock which, under fixed exchange rates, is a close substitute for domestic money? Or is it the money stock of the so-called world's banker, the United States, which drives foreign economies? We address these issues and others in our empirical analysis.

This paper presents the results of an evaluation of the role of real cash balances as a factor input for 11 two-digit SIC code industries over the period 1952-73. Using a four-factor translog cost function for each industry along with duality theory, it was possible to estimate the partial elasticities of substitution and the elasticities of demand for all factors. The substitution elasticities between real cash balances and production labor as well as with capital were found to be significantly different from zero. The interest elasticity of demand for each varies with industry and ranges from -.22 to -.41. The overall findings suggest that the neoclassical model offers considerable promise for modeling the firm's demand for money.

Reviews the book "The Use of Accounting Information in Labor Negotiations," by John R. Palmer.

This paper derives an econometrically meaningful test of the Tiebout hypothesis and demonstrates that previous tests are inappropriate. The implications generated by two closely related models of voter-determined local fiscal variables and individual resident housing choices are compared. We demonstrate that when the Tiebout mechanism operates without interference, housing quantity and location choices are Pareto efficient, while they are not when frictions interfere with its operation. We show that the appropriate test requires joint estimation of a set of structural equations determining housing purchases and locational choices utilizing data for both median and nonmedian voters across metropolitan area jurisdictions.