Timely identification and anticipation of adverse conditions in the financial system are critical for macroprudential policy. However, there is no consensus on how to evaluate the quality of systemic measures. This paper provides a framework to compare measures of systemic conditions. We illustrate the proposed tests with a case study of US measures from 1976 to 2013. We find that measures which include information from multiple markets improve identification of critical system states. However, tested measures show limited capacity to anticipate critical episodes.

This paper builds on existing microprudential and macroprudential early warning systems (EWSs) to develop a new, hybrid class of models for systemic risk that incorporates the structural characteristics of the financial system and a feedback amplification mechanism. The models explain financial stress using both public and proprietary supervisory data from systemically important institutions, regressing institutional imbalances using an optimal lag method. The Systemic Assessment of Financial Environment (SAFE) EWS monitors microprudential information from the largest bank holding companies to anticipate the buildup of macroeconomic stresses in the financial markets. To mitigate inherent uncertainty, SAFE develops a set of medium-term forecasting specifications that gives policymakers enough time to take ex-ante policy action and a set of short-term forecasting specifications for verification and adjustment of supervisory actions. This paper highlights the application of these models to stress testing and policy.