To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
57 results ✕ Clear filters

A Single Geometric Measure for Elasticity of Demand and Supply

Review of Economic Studies 1958 26(1), 63
Journal Article A Single Geometric Measure for Elasticity of Demand and Supply Get access E. J. Mishan E. J. Mishan London Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 26, Issue 1, October 1958, Pages 63–65, https://doi.org/10.2307/2295858 Published: 01 October 1958

Marketing Boards and Economic Development in Nigeria and Ghana

Review of Economic Studies 1958 26(1), 51
Journal Article Marketing Boards and Economic Development in Nigeria and Ghana Get access E. K. Hawkins E. K. Hawkins Nuffield College, Oxford Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 26, Issue 1, October 1958, Pages 51–62, https://doi.org/10.2307/2295857 Published: 01 October 1958

Utility and the "Ordinalist Fallacy"

Review of Economic Studies 1958 25(3), 172
Journal Article Utility and the “Ordinalist Fallacy” Get access W. E. Armstrong W. E. Armstrong Southampton Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 25, Issue 3, June 1958, Pages 172–181, https://doi.org/10.2307/2295985 Published: 01 June 1958

An Economic Justification of Protectionism

Quarterly Journal of Economics 1958 72(4), 496
I. Introduction, 496; Manoilesco, Viner, and Haberler, 496; the argument of this paper, 497. — II. The empirical evidence, 498; economic growth and wage differentials, 498; the data, 499; are the differences real? 503. — III. The analytical model, 504; the one-factor case, 504; the two-factor case, 505; extensions and qualifications, 511. — IV. Empirical corollary; protectionism and growth, 513.

Employment and Output in Banking, 1919-1955

The Review of Economics and Statistics 1958 40(1), 22
QUESTIONS of manpower requirements and economies in labor use have long been close to the heart of economic theory and national policy. The evidence lies in a large and increasing number of productivity studies, ranging from an over-all view of the economy, its total output, and capacity to the most detailed, operational time-and-motion studies. Writers to date have ranged mainly over the fields of manufacturing and extractive industries, where a relative ease of quantification and measurement has facilitated the obtaining of fruitful results. Until recently, however, little work has been done in the service industries because the unit of output is conceptually as well as practically difficult to define and standardize.' The present inquiry will attempt to fill part of this gap for the economy's financial sector, focusing in detail on commercial banking which accounts for roughly one-fifth of the labor force of the financial sector. How great have been the manpower requirements of banking over recent decades? Have they changed for any reason? How is the use of labor in banking related to changes in banking services rendered to the economy? How do employment trends in banking compare with those in the economy as a whole? Inquiries into the use of manpower in commercial banks share not only the usual difficulties in studies of this kind, such as measuring properly, but raise even more difficult questions concerning concepts of output. In deference to the paucity of precedents and the tentative character of many definitions here adopted, this paper will deliberately avoid the use of such normative terms as efficiency or productivity, except in the broadest sense and with possibly a few exceptions where important banking operations can be identified and measured with some accuracy.2 The main purpose of this study is to throw some light on the nature of labor-using bank operations and the response of labor input to growth and technical changes in the industry.

TRAINING FOR AN ACCOUNTING CAREER.

The Accounting Review 1958 33(2), 187-192
Abstract In this article the author presents his views regarding accounting profession. He adds that the word "career" involves some degree of permanence, and therefore a person is trained for it through a combination of formal education and practical experience. Undoubtedly today educational institutions are attempting to teach things that can best be learned through experience, and by the same token the profession is attempting to impart through experience knowledge that could best be imparted by the schools. If this concept, that training for a career is a combination of formal education and practical experience, is kept in mind, he believes that the educational processes and techniques can be designed so as to better prepare the graduate for the experience which he will receive. At the same time, there is a need to establish and maintain standards of training by experience which will take full advantage of the education. In other words, it should be possible to develop these two important elements of training to such a degree that they will complement each other with a minimum of duplication of effort.