you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at

E. Han Kim, Dividend Policy and Valuation: Theory and Tests: Discussions, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 37, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the American Finance Association, Washington, D.C., December 28-30, 1981 (May, 1982), pp. 476-479

E. Han Kim, Elimination of the Double Taxation of Dividends and Corporate Financial Policy: Discussion, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 33, No. 3, Papers and Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Meeting American Finance Association, New York City December 28-30, 1977 (Jun., 1978), pp. 754-757

A capital asset-pricing model which relates risk and return under conditions of changing price levels has been developed in this paper. The resulting model implies that price-level changes do not affect the expected real returns on individual assets except through their impact on the return of the market portfolio. If real market returns are independent of price-level movements, the model is very much like the standard capital asset-pricing model expressed in real returns. This version of the capital asset-pricing model does not, however, resolve all the difficulties associated with changing price levels, since we have assumed that the nominal default-free rate is determined outside the model and that relative prices do not change. These limitations, however, also apply to all other single-period capital asset-pricing models.In addition, the model was converted into nominal returns by assuming that price-level changes and the real market returns are uncorrelated. The resulting equation illustrates the difficulty involved in using nominal returns to test a model expressed in real returns. The same equation also provides a possible explanation for the noted discrepancies between the empirical' evidence found by Black, Jensen, and Scholes [3] and the prediction of the traditional capital asset-pricing model.

This paper examines possible motives for and consequences of voluntary corporate liquidations. Specifically, the procedural and tax differences between voluntary liquidations and other control-changing transaction devices are analyzed. An empirical investigation of successful liquidations shows that the announcement of liquidation reduces the risk of liquidating shares, that the shareholders receive substantial gains from successful liquidations, and that the average gains to the acquiring shareholders are not significantly different from zero. These findings suggest that the liquidating firms' assets have been underutilized before liquidation and that voluntary liquidations lead to higher-valued reallocations of corporate resources.